Letícia Almeida wins the victory against Jonathan Couto in Justice – 07/02/2019



[ad_1]

Letícia Almeida took the victory in court against Jonathan Couto, father of his daughter Maria Magdalena. The actress has appealed and quashed the injunction that prevented her from publicly mentioning Jonathan's name in facts relating to his version of the controversial family affair.

"The decision [anterior] prevented her from talking about domestic violence she suffered, such as rape, related to paternity," said Leticia's lawyer, Michelle Gaetani. "There is a right guaranteed by the constitution of free event that should have been guaranteed to him and that was forbidden," she added.

Leticia was Saulo Poncio's girlfriend and impregnated Jonathan Couto, then a concubine. The actress revealed the truth about her daughter's paternity on social networks and later stated that she had understood that she had been violent and raped, which Jonathan denies. The case, under the secrecy of justice, is the subject of an investigation.

Under the injunction now suspended by the justice of the peace, Leticia should pay a fine of about $ 1,000 a day every time he named Jonathan. "What Leticia wants, is to highlight what it has suffered to help other women victims of domestic violence or rape so that they have the strength and that this does not happen. happen more, "said the lawyer.

Charges

A new conciliation hearing between Letícia Almeida and Jonathan Couto's family is scheduled for Thursday (7) in Rio de Janeiro. She and her father have accused ex-parents-in-law and Saulo Poncio of insults, injuries and crimes.

"When Leticia went to see her ex-in-law to get her daughter's birth certificate, she and her father were beaten." Saulo pulled his cellphone and broke it by throwing it away. land, "said the actress' s lawyer. .

On June 20, Leticia was in the 16th DP (Barra da Tijuca), accompanied by her father, Claudenei Almeida, following a confusion in Saulo's condominium, involving Simone Pontius and her former beauties. parents. Márcio José Souza, because of Mary Magdalene, known as Madah. She accused the mother-in-law of having torn her clothes.

"The purpose of the preliminary hearing is to reconcile these facts." There is no possibility of agreement because they were crimes that occurred and they never showed any willingness to repent, they only attacked all the time. should result in an agreement, "said Gaetani.

[ad_2]
Source link