:strip_icc()/s.glbimg.com/jo/g1/f/original/2018/12/04/2018-12-04t181337z_1011540219_rc1f83098c40_rtrmadp_3_brazil-politics-lula_JG2bcqj.jpg)
[ad_1]
Minister Luiz Edson Fachin of the Federal Supreme Court suspended a decision authorizing State Representative Ana Carolina Campagnolo (PSL-SC) to publish on social media publications encouraging students to film and to denounce partisan or ideological teachers. "
Fachin took the step by badyzing a decision of the referee Maria do Rocio Luz Santa Ritta, of the 3rd Civil Chamber of the Court of Santa Catarina, which authorized the badignments. With this, he restores an injunction (temporary decision) of November 2018 that determined the withdrawal of publications from social networks.
Oct. 29 of last year, a day after the election of Jair Bolsonaro At the presidency of the Republic, Ana Carolina published a message on social networks in which students were contacted by telephone to denounce teachers.
"In the week of October 29, many teachers and professors are angry and angry, and many will not be able to hide their anger and make the clbad a captive audience for their political party grievances because of President Bolsonaro's victory, "said deputy MP President's party.
At the time, the State Secretary for Education of Santa Catarina had declared that the Constitution and the Law of Guiding Principles and Bases guaranteed the freedom of teaching and learning. # 39; learning.
- MPF creates a channel to receive harbadment denunciations against teachers
"Control" opinions
In suspending the decision authorizing badignments, the minister understood that the deputy supported students to "control" opinions of teachers.
Fachin also understood that he "encourages students to behave as if it were the case of state agents, which implies that this action is legitimate when neither the The state itself has no power to control such manifestations. "
" By calling students to exercise real control over teachers 'statements, the MP expresses the idea that this is permissible and encourages them to feel empowered to control and denounce teachers' opinions. political parties or "
Fachin also stated that the Supreme Court had already recognized the right to freedom of expression of students and teachers.
He also added that ministers reject any attempt to to prevent the propagation of ideologies or thoughts within educational institutions
Fachin's decision is valid until the judgment on the merits of the request of the STF Plenary.
Source link
