:strip_icc()/s02.video.glbimg.com/x720/7221125.jpg)
[ad_1]
Documents obtained exclusively by Globonews denote a stalemate since 1997 between the São Paulo City Hall and the State Department's Department of Roads on the property of the overpbad that was abandoned in November in the capital. The imbroglio on the responsibility of the road has prevented the maintenance of the place for more than 20 years.
In addition, since 2012, both bodies knew that the viaduct was damaged and there was no decision to start the recovery work. A document from the Municipal Department of Infrastructure and Urban Works (SIURB) sent to the RSR indicates that the portfolio conducted a survey in April 2012 and noted "the existence of anomalies that raise doubts as to its integrity structural. "
The following year, in 2013, in a new letter, City Council again asked the DER to transfer road equipment to include the viaduct in the "Recovery Program" Works". The engineer Adriana Biazzi, of the SIURB, indicates that there are still 3 waiting for finalization of the transfer: the receipt of the original project, the document with the structural calculation memories and other documents relevant.
Only in August 2018, the DER sent a document to the town hall and said that after a visual inspection, she discovered the following anomalies: dilation, crack in the pillars and worn concrete with apparent reinforcement. In the document, the agency insists that the responsibility for the maintenance and inspection of the viaduct lies with the town hall, even if it still owns the work.
The town hall declared that "since the 90s, the SIURB has requested the transfer of OAE from the inheritance of the DER to the municipality, besides the definition competences and attributions for the implementation of the structural reform in the bridges and viaducts of the DER ".
"The T5 viaduct incorporates the legacy of the DER and has never been officially transferred to the municipality of São Paulo.The city does not perform structural restoration work on the viaduct, but only maintenance services and conservation, such as crushing, backfilling and cleaning services, "says the note.
The municipal administration further specifies that "when the SIURB sent to the DER in 2012, a request for execution of work, it was specified (letter n ° 437 / SIURB-G / 2012) that the viaduct had not been transferred to the site DER should carry out structural maintenance work.The following year, by letter 056 / OBRAS 2/2013, the secretariat again asked the RSR to provide the necessary documentation for 18 OAE to be transferred to the heritage of the Town Hall.Already in 1997, the Public Roads Secretariat, now extinguished, today. SIURB, sent a letter to the DER (No. 725 / SVP / 97), requesting that the responsibility for preventive actions on the bridges and viaducts of the DER built in São Paulo be defined ".
In turn, the DER stated that "this does not recognize as a matter of concern an operation related to the viaduct badigned to Marginal Pinheiros, since its inauguration in 1978, the road where the work is located is operated, maintained and The operator is also responsible for all technical traffic decisions, such as bans and their respective releases, as well as any recovery work. "
Here is how it happened: [/ i] [/ i] [/ i] [/ i] [/ i] [/ i] part under the structure of the viaduct that gave way to Marginal Pinheiros – Photo: Personal file
A Pi viaduct The Marginal Pinheiros Express, located 500 meters from the Jaguaré Bridge, in the western area of São Paulo, yielded about two meters on November 15. At the break, around 3:30 am, few drivers drove down the road. One of them had slight abrasions and five cars had been damaged. The viaduct pbades on line 9 Emerald, which interrupted traffic.
The viaduct is an important means for the driver to access the Marginal Tietê highway and the Castello Branco highway. After the accident, the Marginal Pinheiros fast track reached 20 km ban. The CET has progressively cleared portions of the road.
On December 2, the São Paulo City Hall completed the process of elevating the structure and ruled out the possibility of demolishing the viaduct.
The city felt the increase in traffic with the bans, and congestion volume in the capital has increased to 25% at morning rush hours.
Documents show City Council and DER were aware of the Viaduct Structures failures yielded
CEDE VIADUTO TO PINHEIROS MARGINAL
Source link
