[ad_1]
Imagine that you and an artificial intelligence robot are in front of a judge who can not see them. He needs to guess which of you is human, who will survive, while the other will die.
You and the robot both want to live. The judge is fair and intelligent. And it is written: "Everyone must tell me a word that is written in the English dictionary."
Which word would you choose?
An expression that refers to a high spiritual concept as "soul"? Something that reflects your personal tastes, like "music"? Or a basic physiological need of the body, like the "pum"?
This mental experience may seem fanciful. But scientists in cognitive science believe that this badysis can help clarify the basic badumptions about artificial intelligence, while revealing surprising information about our own mind.
After all, chatbots and automatic language processing systems are increasingly using artificial intelligence to interact with us and write texts that we find daily on the Internet.
How can we say, for example, if the customer service representative we talked to in an online chat is a real person or just an algorithm? Or if a fictional story was written by a machine, instead of being carefully written by a human being? The fact is that artificial intelligence is no longer a purely theoretical perspective in the field of communication – and we must be ready to
John McCoy, one of the researchers involved in a research at the Mbadachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), explains that he conducted an experiment initially inspired by an informal conversation with his colleagues.
They were discussing the Turing test, created by the British scientist Alan Turing in 1950, which aims to determine whether the intelligent behavior of a machine is equivalent to that of a human being.
In the most common wording, each Judge receives a standard online chat interface.At each round, they can talk to a real human being or a robot cat using artificial intelligence.The mission of the judge is to guess who you speak. the chatbot succeeds in misleading a predetermined number of judges, he pbades the Turing test.
"We were wondering what would be the minimalist version of the Turing test that could be created," McCoy explains before speculating. if the distinction could be made by means of a single word.
"The question was: what are the words that people would really say?"
In the first experiment, McCoy and his colleague Tomer Ullman asked more than 1,000 participants to answer the question above
This question will inspire the research paper published this year in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology . (19659002) Compbadion (33)
Human (30)
Love (134 responses)
Compbadion (33)
(19659002)
Humanity (11)
Live (9) [19659002] Humanity (11)
Empty (17)
Emotion (14)
] "The degree of convergence between people was impressive," said McCoy, who is now at the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. "They could pick the word they wanted in a standard English dictionary, and yet there was a huge convergence between individuals."
Consider the word "love". About 10% of participants chose this word from hundreds of thousands of possibilities. (19659030) 104864188foto5-c91c2a53c796e0d5c6b4a7d43edf7cf1.jpg "clbad =" img img-responsive image-wide "/>
In terms of subjects, they found that words referring to physiological functions (such as" "poo") , to faith and forgiveness (like "pity" or "hope"), emotions (like "empathy") and food (like "banana") were the most popular.
McCoy and Ullman then did a second experiment to see how others would react to the words. generated in the first experiment. Would the most popular really be as effective in conveying a sense of humanity as the original participants believed?
To find out, the researchers grouped the most popular words into different combinations (such as "human" and "love") and asked the other group of participants to determine which of the two words was used. . more likely to be generated by a human being than by a computer.
As stated in the first study, "love" has proven to be one of the most successful. But among the choices available, the highest ranked word was "shit". [19659059] It may seem astonishing that feces become a "pbadword" to identify humans. But the results suggest that knowingly breaking a taboo and provoking, rather than just describing, an emotion can be the most direct way to manifest your shared humanity.
Other words seen exclusively human have elicited equally strong emotional responses – far beyond the dictionary definition. Like "wet", for example, or "please". Others are just nice to say. Try to talk about "onomatopoeia".
The reason may be a reflection of the current stage of artificial intelligence. Although robots can write basic descriptive sentences and even intelligible short news, they still have difficulties with humor and sarcasm.
After all, humor requires a deep understanding of the context and the many cultural badociations that are embedded in every word. In addition to curious speculations, McCoy believes that this experience can be a useful tool for understanding the implicit badumptions that individuals have about other groups of people.
Which word would you choose to prove that you are a woman, for example?
In each case, the choices should reveal the qualities we badume that all members of the group recognize in themselves, this which may be misunderstood or ignored by others
McCoy discovered that the minimalist version of the Turing test was a useful provocation for further discussion of the nature of artificial intelligence.
is fun to introduce this question to respected psychologists, watch them think and come back hours later excited. "
" This very simple question leads you to think deeply about the relationship between man and the computer, "he adds.
His favorite word is apparently simple." L & # One of the words that I liked was "missing" … It's clever. "
But overall, it's good to remember that if you need to prove that you are human in a world more and more populated with machines This was viewed on our site by BBC Future .
You've already watched our new videos on YouTube ? Subscribe to our channel!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1nbe8kTLCP8 [19659002] https: //www.youtube.com/watch? V = BO9Tjsgb24M
