[ad_1]
The government of President Jair Bolsonaro (PSL) included in the target list of the first hundred days of government the regulation of home schooling, also called home schooling, through a provisional measure. considered illegal at the end of last year by the STF (Federal Supreme Court). At the time, most ministers understood that, in the absence of regulation, parents could not legally guarantee the right of their children to education.
With the interim measure, the situation of families teach their children at home. According to an estimate released last year by Aned (National Home Education Association), they were about 7,500 at the time
. Some of them are composed of people at odds with the educational line offered in schools for religious reasons. unlike this measure, let us mention the frequency of educational institutions as a child's right and insist that the school is an important space for socialization.
Aned said Wednesday that she had contributed to the development of the text of the interim measure with the Bolsonaro government.
The entity claims to have solicited in December the Minister of Education, Ricardo Vélez Rodriguez, for the MP's edition. Subsequently, ministry advisers said the issue would have more relationship with the field of human and family rights than with formal education.
Therefore, the measure was in charge of the domain of the Minister Damares Alves (Women, Family and Human Rights)
Aned said he has submitted a draft proposal, which is being badyzed Portfolio and the Civil House. "We are working to make this process quick," the entity said, suggesting that the text could constitute an interim approval while the Congress does not approve a bill.
"For the record, the deputy has full force of law. [e] will leave us at least during the first half of 2019. In the meantime, we will seek the necessary articulations to ensure that the education in the house is definitely regulated, in order to give the Brazilian family the freedom to choose how to educate their children. ", says the text of the organization
THE HEALTH OF HOUSEHOLDS IN THE SUPREME
L & # 39; home schooling has won supporters since 2016, when STF minister, Luís Roberto Barroso, suspended all court decisions preventing parents from raising their children at home
At the vote of the STF, motivated by a request from a family from the city of Canela (RS), he was the only one to decide on the legality of the practice. 9659002] The family of the gaucho city of Rio Grande do Sul went to court after the Municipal Secretary of Education rejected a request that the girl, at age 11 years old, take clbades at home.
Barroso argued that school children had other possibilities
Minister Alexander de Moraes opened the divergence and was accompanied by seven judges: Rosa Weber, Luiz Fux, Ricardo Lewandowski, Gilmar Mendes and Marco Aurélio. Dias Toffoli and Carmen Lúcia. They felt that for the option of home schooling to be valid it should be provided for by law.
Fux and Lewandowski went further: for them, "school at home" would be unconstitutional, even contrary to the Constitution. that it would be governed by a law.
Lewandowski emphasized the importance of the school for coexistence with diversity. "When bubbles form in which the same ideas resonate, which is common in social networks, mutual understanding becomes increasingly difficult, contributing to the fragmentation of society, polarization and extremism. ", did he declare. Already Edson Fachin partially diverged and proposed to give the Congress a year to legislate on the subject, but was vanquished. Celso de Mello did not attend the session.
Source link
