[ad_1]
247 – The abandonment of the United Nations pact on migration by Brazil, at the behest of the government of Jair Bolsonaro, will undoubtedly result in an image loss for the country and indicate for "incivilidade , inhumanity and coldness in the treatment of migrants, ie pure barbarism, insofar as it contributes to xenophobia in right-wing discourse. "The badessment is conducted by Carol Proner, PhD in law international, professor at the UFRJ and founding member of the ABJD, in an interview with 247. Carol Proner is also a member of the Brazilian editorial board 247.
"What the Bolsonaro government says, with l. abandonment of this commitment in the field of human rights, incivility, inhumanity and coldness in the treatment of migrants, ie barbarism, since It contributes to xenophobia in the speeches of the 39, far right, "she said. for whom the decision becomes contradictory, since "the number of Brazilians living abroad is almost double or even triple the number of migrants who have been accepted."
The lawyer also points out that unlike the other countries that supported the pact, such as Hungary, Poland and Austria, which she also considers "deplorable: Brazil", with only 750 000 inhabitants living in Brazil, on a universe of 200 million inhabitants, that represents 0.4% According to the data of the federal police, which makes this decision, at least, pretentious, supposing that Brazil can influence the already catastrophic world situation. "
Check out the full interview:
Among the misdeeds of a government that haunts Twitter's ability to produce factoids, it's really confirmed the new that the government Brazil abandoned the migration pact, technically called the Global Compact for a safe, orderly and regular migration.We learned the sending by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of telegrams in which the Foreign Ministry would have asked Brazilian diplomats and missions to inform the relevant international bodies, the Secretary General of the United Nations and the Director General of the International Migration.
The decision, in addition to to be regrettable from the point of view of civility (or its lack of civility), is rather an international embarrbadment for these inexplicable, or is justified only within the framework of a pro logic It is also illogical that this decline is due to the fact that the Global Compact is not an international treaty, but an intergovernmental agreement aimed at improving the administration of migration problems in the world.
It is also illogical because Brazil is a priority country for migratory flows. As such, it does not bind, it does not generate sanctions for non-compliance, it does not create new rights and does not subject or condition the development of autonomous and sovereign policies.
What the Bolsonaro government says, with the abandonment of this commitment in terms of human rights, is incivility, inhumanity and coldness in the treatment of migrants, that is, barbarism, since it contributes to xenophobia in far-right speeches.
How Important is the Global Compact and
The previous precedent of this pact is a consensus reached in 2016 in the "New York Declaration on Refugees and Migrants", then that the world recognizes that increasing migration is a problem. of world order, which requires the cooperation of all nations. Since April 2017, the terms and deadline for signing the Global Compact have been defined in the resolution adopted by the UN General Assembly. All countries, with the exception of the United States, participated in the negotiations that led to the accession of two-thirds of the members (164 of the 193 UN member countries).
Even non-binding in the sense hard law the pact is a politically valid cooperation commitment, which involves migration and human trafficking as an incidental phenomenon, a vicious circle that increases the number of victims only in a state of absolute vulnerability. The central objectives of the document are to develop information systems on international migration, precisely to minimize the factors that force people to leave their country and, consequently, to find alternatives to reduce vulnerabilities and fight against trafficking and trafficking.
In summary, the Global Compact provides for the reinforcement of measures already dealt with in other conventional documents within the framework of the UN and regional systems, such as the clbadic principle of non-refoulement, understood as an imperative. international law (jus cogens). The pact stipulates that the migrant can not be returned / expelled immediately and that each case must be badyzed individually. It also provides that the migrant is entitled to an identification document and that detention must be a last resort and, where appropriate, as short as possible. The document reinforces the predictions of refugee status, access to justice, basic humanitarian rights such as health, living conditions, education and information and reaffirms the government 's position. obvious humanitarian obvious: collective expulsions and any form of discrimination are prohibited as a criterion of permanence.
The new Brazilian law on migration, promulgated in May 2017, is fully in line with the content of the Global Compact, considering the migratory movement as a human right and a contemporary drama fighting against xenophobia and discrimination. Therefore, the decision of the Bolsonaro government hurts the Brazilian tradition of a welcoming, mixed and intercultural country and opts for the adulation of the far right governments of the planet.
To leave the Global Compact on Migration, President Jair Bolsonaro says Brazil is sovereign to decide on the subject.
Let's leave this answer to an unsuspicious, in the eyes of the right, the former Chancellor of the Temer government, Aloysio Nunes Ferreira, for whom the pact "only aims to serve as a reference for the management of flows without interference in each country's sovereign definition of its migration policy. "
We know that the response of other countries to the Global Compact is directly related to the serious migration problems they face. Europeans. Hungary, Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Austria are among the dissenting countries whose negotiations took a decisive turn in the last few months of negotiations. They also opposed Bulgaria, Switzerland, Australia and Italy. I consider this withdrawal regrettable, unacceptable, but understandable, because the subject is largely occupied by the political agenda of these countries. But Brazil? With a population of only 750,000 migrants living in Brazil, out of 200 million, this represents 0.4% of the country's population, according to data from the federal police, which makes this decision, at least, pretentious, baduming that the Brazil can influence the already catastrophic global situation. In addition to being immodest, we had no support.
Can this measure affect Brazilians living abroad? Or the image of Brazil on the international scale?
This is the most contradictory. The number of Brazilians living abroad is almost double, if not triple, according to the level of migrants. According to the International Migration Report of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat (Desa), in 2017 there were about 1.6 million Brazilians abroad. The Brazilian Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MRE) has registered more than 3 million Brazilians abroad in 2016.
It is not possible to say that the abrupt decision of the Brazilian government could directly affect these people, because it is up to each country, sovereignly, to build migration policy criteria. But there is no doubt that this will lead to further deterioration of the image, thus fueling the already imaginary symbolic imagery of hostility, lack of reciprocity vis-à-vis other countries, disengagement of human rights. It is inseparable from the Bolsonaro and caverna of this brutal and ill-informed far-right pecha, aggravated by incidents such as Brazil's refusal to host the United Nations Climate Conference or the threats of leaving the Paris Agreement
] It is sad to see how this kind of unthinking attitude can reverse the achievements of recent years, even when Brazil, given the number of expatriates compared to the number of people welcomed , enjoys double the right of emigration
[ad_2]
Source link
