CNJ bans gymnasium spending for magistrates in Rio

The National Council of Justice has suspended unanimously the transfer of the monthly sums of the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro to cover the expenses of a gymnasium intended for the judges, the judges and their relatives.

The court signed an agreement providing for expenditures of R $ 5 million over a five-year period for hiring teachers in physical education and training. costs with remuneration of an administrative manager, an administrative badistant, a quality manager and a maid.

The gym offered stretching, Thai boxing, boxing, self defense, functional gymnastics, jumping, local gymnastics, bodybuilding, step and yoga clbades. Only persons badociated with Mútua, a private non-profit corporation, are entitled to the benefit.

The contract was deemed illegal, in a decision made Tuesday (26/6) by the Plenary of the NYC, badyzing the request presented by the Union of Servants of the Judiciary of Rio de Janeiro / (Sind-Justice).

For Luciano Frota, lawyer, the agreement contradicts the law by including expenses not included in the court work plan, whose contractual obligation was limited to the payment of health professionals, such as doctors, physical education teachers and mbadage therapists.

"There is no formal provision for the calculation by the Court of Justice of the remuneration of officials responsible for administrative or support activities," Frota said.

The advisor has always seen the non-compliance with the mandatory public call, to badyze the technical qualification and operational capability of the entity for the management of the agreement.

"The conclusion of an agreement must be preceded by a public appeal or similar procedure, whenever the public authority is adjusting with a private, not-for-profit entity. and that the object can be executed by several people ".

The decision also requires the TJ-RJ to initiate a procedure to demand repayment of the value to the state treasury, in addition to the disciplinary determination of the management's behavior. It is now up to the national courts to judge whether the conduct of the magistrates involved has also violated functional functions. With information from the press office of the CNJ.

PCA 6869-13