[ad_1]
The Corinthians managed, in the last days of 2018, to make the feasible by contracting the Ramiro wheel that defended the Guild . The commercial model that allowed the transfer of the player is very positive for the club of São Paulo, who did not pay anything to bring the athlete led by Giuliano Bertolucci and can still make profits on a future sale without risk of loss.
One of the most influential businessmen of Brazilian football, Bertolucci is involved in an investigation of the Special Action Group against Organized Crime (Gaeco) of the Public Prosecutor's Office of Rio Grande do Sul . She pointed out that businessmen had made deposits to the personal accounts of senior officials of Inter's football department during the management of Vitorio Piffero.
Regarding the hiring of Ramiro, the format of the negotiation between Corinthians and the businessman enrolled in the new rules of FIFA, but with a " dribble "in the standards. In May 2015, the highest governing body of football banned agents from having economic rights over athletes.
"Before the clubs paid out the contractors and specified the percentage in the contracts, this was prohibited by FIFA, and after the veto some clubs began to organize payments." The future in absolute terms is allowed, "explained João Henrique Chiminazzo, a lawyer specializing in sports law, in an interview with UOL Esporte .
L & # 39; agreement between Corinthians and Bertolucci does not in fact mention payment term to the contractor.In the "dribble", the club managed to secure the arrival of Ramiro by agreeing to buy 70% the economic rights of the athlete, Bertolucci slice, without spending a dime with the businessman, former holder of economic rights.This part would cost 3 million euros (12.8 million R $) .The agreement between the parties provides that Corinthians will reimburse the agent, but does not set a date.
If a midfielder's proposal comes up during the 2019 season, the board of Alvinegra's administration is not obliged to accept it.If this happens from 2020, Corinthians has the opportunity to cover the offer or sell the leaflet. Bertolucci would receive a 70% share.
The case is different, for example, from the business model that allowed the transfer of Everton's midfield to . São Paulo last year . To engage the player, the tricolor club received a loan from businessman Carlos Leite, amounting to 11 million rand. As a result, he paid the fine for Flamengo who held 50% of the rights. The agent, owner of the other half, has ceased to have a stake in the division and has paid Sao Paulo's debt in monthly installments.
The report of UOL Esporte was looking for parties involved in Ramiro's recruitment. Bertolucci did not respond to messages sent nor to calls. Corinthians, on the other hand, said the model was in line with FIFA's rules, since Ramiro's economic rights belong to the club.
"Corinthians has fully acquired the percentage of ownership held by the company since the According to the agreement reached between the parties, the acquisition will be paid at the time and the sale of the athlete", said Luiz Felipe Santoro, a lawyer serving Corinthians.
Loans granted to entrepreneurs in future transfers are precisely what FIFA forbids in its Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players . Article 18 states that "no club or player may conclude with a third party an agreement whereby a third party is entitled to participate, in whole or in part, in compensation for the future transfer. from one player from one club to another, or be granted a right to a subsequent transfer or a transfer fee. "
In the case of Corinthians and Bertolucci, the absence of a date of payment stipulated in a contract opens the possibility, even if it is not possible, of the agent to put pressure on the club so that it speeds up a possible sale of Ramiro, because this is not that as well as the value of economic rights would actually be paid to the entrepreneur.
When there is a proposal from Ramiro, the transfer to the entrepreneur may also disobey the National Regulations on the Registration and Transfer of Athletes. CBF, whose article 9 explains that the value of a termination penalty "is due exclusively to the club for which the athlete was enrolled, excluding the adjustment that implies a link or requirement of total or partial income in favor of third parties, in the form of Article 18 of FIFA Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players [trecho reproduzido acima]. "
]
[ad_2]
Source link
