[ad_1]
Former President Dilma Rousseff posted a note on her social networks on Sunday (1), in which she denounced the persecution of former President Lula and the politically-banning maneuvers. and electorally
Check it out [
history will recall that some higher courts were subjected to the arbitrary decision of a judge of first instance
After being convicted without evidence, the Former President Lula is a victim of the blockade of his resources by the judiciary. All the appeals presented by Lula's defense are summarily dismissed by casuistic measures or artifice based on cunning maneuvers.
Lula is the victim of a ban on his constitutional rights. If a judgment can be beneficial, it is postponed, suspended and will not even enter the court system. If a decision can possibly favor you, it is refused without being examined.
In order to prevent Lula from being a candidate, some kind of judicial justification was established. First, they denounced it without evidence, solely on the basis of convictions; later, they sentenced him for "indeterminate reasons"; then he was thrown into prison before the trial of his appeals, a right guaranteed to other defendants and other prisoners;
The media engaged in the coup insinuate that Lula will only get judicial power that the right to liberty – granted to other prisoners – he announces that he has given up his candidacy for the presidency. It's blackmail. They want Lula to punish herself for her political rights. They want Lula to self-destruct as Brazil's greatest political leader.
History reports that some superior courts have subserviently complied with the arbitrary decision of a judge of first instance. The story goes that some higher courts have not only waived the right to decide, but have abdicated the duty to judge, when their verdict could represent the fair freedom of a citizen.
[ad_2]
Source link
