[ad_1]
MOSCOW, RUSSIA (FOLAAPRESS) – The use of the VAR (video referee) did not have a significant impact on the fluidity of the World Cup matches.
According to FIFA data released on Friday, After the 48 matches of the group stage, only 38 seconds per game average were spent to check the bids with the help of technology.
This represents only 1% of the 39 minutes and 50 seconds (4,190 seconds) in which the ball does not roll.
Collina's addressed to the press Friday – (Photo : Reproduction / Video)
Still according to FIFA, the matches of the World Cup of Russia lasted 96 minutes and 35 seconds, with an increase of the time of increase compared to Brazil, while it was 5 minutes and 19 seconds, including the break for the administration
The biggest stop time is due to mistakes: on average 8 minutes and 16 seconds.
"The big question is how much the VAR would interfere with the game and we saw that it did not break the pace of the game with a lot of i NTERVENTIONS. current Chairman of the FIFA Arbitration Committee, Pierluigi Collina.
The entity is also satisfied with the use of technology and said that up to now 335 deals and incidents during the games were reviewed in the center of Moscow. This includes the 122 goals already scored. ” clbad=”img-responsive”/>
According to FIFA, the index of agreement with the use of VAR is 99.3%
"At this point, we are very pleased with the performance of the referees."
"There is no way to achieve perfection, but 99.3% of correct is very close to that," said Collina. "said former referee Mbadimo Busacca director of the Arbitration Commission.
Of the 335 incidents reviewed, but not counting the actual use of VAR, Zuber pushed Miranda into the goal that resulted in a 1-1 draw between Switzerland and Brazil in the first round of the World Cup.
This Friday, for the first time, FIFA released the audio of communication between people in the VAR room and the Mexican referee Cesar Ramos
In the communication, it is explained to the referee in the field that Zuber did not fail and that the shot was therefore not to be reviewed. 19659002] The Italian Paolo Valeri was the VAR (video referee).
"In football, all the contacts are not lacking, a contact does not mean a lack, maybe in other sports but not in football, "he said.
" They asked us for the audio, but it's not appropriate to discuss it r during the competition. "
He also explained the fact of broadcasting the audio now and not just after the match. "
" The answer we are giving now is clear and fair with the CBF, "he concluded.
On Friday, it was the first time that FIFA had evoked the use of VAR since the beginning of the World Cup and demonstrated the use of technology in other movements
The Disciplinary Committee may act after the game.
use of the VAR and all offers supervised by 33 cameras, the FIFA Disciplinary Committee in. To investigate an athlete or to punish athletes by badyzing images later.
For example, if an athlete curses the referee and is not warned on the spot.
Up to now, no athlete has been punished like this
Gesture requesting a re-listen does not result in mandatory yellow
Colina also explained that referees are not not obliged to give a yellow card to the players who make the gesture the move is examined
"The criterion of warning to someone is not the gesture, but rather how it is done, whether it is incisive or not. "The referee's recommendation is that the judge does not spend the cards in a way that could cost a player suspension." I think judges should be praised and not criticized for that, "said Colina. (N) = n (n) = n (n) = n (n)
n.callMethod.apply (n, arguments): n.queue.push (arguments)}; if (! f._fbq) f._fbq = n;
n.queue = 0; n.version = 2.0 & # 39 ;; n.queue = []; t = b.createElement (e); t.async =! 0;
t.src = v; s = b.getElementsByTagName (e) [0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore (t, s)} (window,
document, "script", https: //connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js');
fbq (& # 39; init; # 517402355136539 & # 39;)
fbq ("track", "Pageview");
[ad_2]
Source link
