[ad_1]
In practice, the movement of Flávio Bolsonaro endorsed by the young fool Fux has frozen investigations until at least January 31st, when the break ends and the STF resumes normal operation. The case should therefore be badyzed by the rapporteur Marco Aurélio Mello. This decision causes discomfort to the entire clan, including the President of the Republic. The administrator and his sons – besides Flávio, the deputy Eduardo and Alderman Carlos – have already manifested themselves in the past in a manner contrary to the privileged tribune, the right of the holders of certain functions to be judged only by certain courts: of the privileged forum? "Eduardo writes." I do not want this shit forum, "Jair said in a video that appears alongside a Flávio who agreed with what he had said. [19659002] The defense request also restricts the Minister of Justice, the former judge Sérgio Moro, who, when he was directing the operation Lava Jato, always stressed that the opportunity privileged forum was a morosidade factor in the judicial system and impunity Lawyer Deltan Dallagnol, who coordinates the working group of Lava Jato in Curitiba, pronounced against Twitter on the decision "With all due respect to Minister Fux, there is no way to accept the decision, which is contrary to the Supreme Court's precedent. In fact, before the mandate, there is no privileged forum before the Supreme Court. It is to be expected that Minister Marco Aurelio will cancel the injunction. "The former Attorney General of the Republic, Rodrigo Janot, was more synthetic and only wrote" Heinnnnnnnn ??? "on Twitter while sharing a report on the suspension of the process until the Bolsonaro allies demonstrate against, such as the MP Janaína Paschoal and members of the MBL (Movimento Brasil Livre). Council of Control of Financial Activities (Coaf) revealed that Queiroz would have transferred more than one million reais on his account.The legislator has always said that it was not necessary to investigate. "I keep my conscience calm, because I did not do anything wrong. I am not under investigation, "he wrote on December 8, on Twitter, and now there is a question about this statement: In a statement posted on Instagram, Flavio's office indicates that the request was made" because, after having had access to the procedure, he found the senator under investigation "and that" this falls within the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. "
In his decision on Thursday, Fux writes that the defense claimed that" after his election as senator of the republic, the local ministerial body was confirmed, [MP-RJ] asked Coaf for information on the confidential data of its owner covering the period from April 2007 to the date of implementation of the due diligence, under the pretext of instructing said investigation procedure. According to the defense, "the investigation procedure is based on information obtained illegally". Finally, Fux says that it will be up to the rapporteur of the case, Minister Marco Aurélio, to make a final decision on the request of Flávio's lawyers.
The suspension request of the elected senator also revived the debate of the privileged forum. In May 2018, the ministers of the court partially changed the scope of this provision for senators and MPs, limiting it to crimes committed during the exercise of their mandate. The facts investigated by the Rio Prosecutor General's Office cover a period from 2016 to 2017, when Flávio was still a member of parliament without the right to a privileged forum.
Flávio's defense states that, despite the new interpretation, the Court's decision opens a loophole for the defense. The member's lawyer quotes in his request an excerpt from the judgment of the STF: "The combination of the criteria for the exercise of the mandate and function requires the Court to continue to decide, on a case-by-case basis, whether the crime is related or No, it must be done by the STF itself, which is responsible for determining whether the proceedings are still pending or whether they are brought before the lower court. "
In addition In the Flávio case, the Queiroz case also runs up against the president himself, who enjoys an inherent immunity to charge La Coaf has identified transfers from the former counselor to the account of the first lady, Michelle Bolsonaro, totaling R $ 24,000. The agent said the value was related to a series of loans that she had given to the driver and that had been withdrawn with checks of 4,000 reais. The woman's account would have been used because he could not go to the bank because of the work routine. The President has always denied any wrongdoing and has stated that he has not declared the value of the loan in his income tax statement because the amounts were minimal and highly fragmented, which is why the "inflated"
.
[ad_2]
Source link
