[ad_1]
Famous for being "heavy" Gnome Shell improves its performance and intends to leave this label in the past.
Gnome Shell is constantly criticized for demanding that modern equipment be used for its operation to be described as "heavy". It is notorious that he uses RAM at system startup and that he sometimes presents small gaps in his animations. With several visual elements inspired by other systems, the Gnome DE is a case of hatred or pbadion, it seems that there is no medium term and if it exists, it is a job for extensions, which used indifferently can cause in system overload and
Gnome's loan with Ubuntu is not the "right" thing to do, I think you'll notice the actual difference of each
Keeping the hull "cleaner" as suggested by the staff of GNOME, Fedora is a good system to see the evolution and performance improvement of Gnome, of course nothing " border = "0" data-original-height = "568" data-original-width = "1010" height = "358" src = "https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-cUPI-7lOOyk/XFTWUoBF6LI/ YAAAAAAAAJv8 / 96Tv0VIrK3getuwh_mcqsyzLUFZ7g-2igCLcBGAs / s640 / 01% 2Bgnome% 2Bper.jpg "title =" Gnome Shell Fedora "width =" 640 "/>
" Performance Performance "
It's obvious that q that perfection is not a possible thing when we talk about software and it would be redundant to say that "a magic pbad" the Gnome shell would start to get incredible results in terms of performance, but, not realizing much in testing new versions and benefiting from minor improvements, the notoriety of "heavy" does not seem to be something that will stay in the present for a very long time. Georges Stavracas Neto a Brazilian developer of GNOME, works on these two components and focuses on code performance and cleanup. 19659010] With the support of Canonical programmers, such as developer Daniel Van Vugt, George improves the performance of Shell and its composer, working on Wayland, replacing the code. old for new with new technologies and the implementation of small improvements that, overall, improve the experience of the system.
are slow, increase the latency between the action of the user and the system, the inefficient use of the cache, among other things, were only "the visible part iceberg "improvements used.
Bugs are also fixed and with writing. More effective code enhancements, such as loading icon animation and system boot, are improvements that you may notice in Gnome version 3.32 probably dating from of March . .
And have you tested the latest versions of Gnome Shell? I admit that I am proud to see a Brazilian participate in the development of such an important project. It's a personal note, my congratulations to Georges and other project collaborators who make a difference in the daily lives of many people.
See you in the next post and you already know the blog Diolinux SYSTEMATIQUE .
Have you noticed any errors or would you like to add any suggestions on this? Collaborate, click here.
