Green New Deal exposes watermelons: it's disguised communism as an environmentalist



[ad_1]

We must thank for the existence of an Ocasio-Cortez of Alexandria. I know how scary it is to think that someone like this has come to the US Congress, but at least it helps to reveal the true extremist face of the current Democratic Party, or at least its "socialist" wing in full growth. The group no longer tries to disguise it: it openly preaches egalitarian collectivism, old socialism, in a mixture of historical ignorance and political opportunism.

The new wave of the American left must speak of the Green New Deal. They want to save the militancy of FDR, even without the pretext of the crisis of the 29. What is the pretext, today, is the imminent climatic threat, as well as the inequalities of identity. Ocaso-Cortez has already said that in 12 years it will no longer be possible to save the planet if nothing is done, a gym for hysteria. But finally, the proposals of the Green New Deal were revealed and they revealed much more than they should: it is a communist project, without even accepting it.

The Conservatives have already accused the environmental movement of being a disguise of communist widows long ago. They accuse the ecoterrorists of watermelons, green on the outside and red on the inside. Now, there is no need to accuse: the supporters of the Green New Deal are out of the closet. In an interview, Ocasio-Cortez said he agreed with the journalist when he was questioned about conservative critics that the bill would require mbadive intervention by the state.

In the project itself, which seems more written by a dictator of a banana republiqueta or a purple-haired university and potboy, there is so much barbarism, so much of it. absurd, so much radicalism, so much utopia, which is really embarrbading, and even Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi managed to tactically move away from her Shia comrades. Michael Knowles of the Daily Wire (Ben Shapiro) has dedicated a podcast to the project's line-by-line dissection, which is simply bizarre.

First, they want to reshape America's energy matrix in just a decade. Something like 90% would be traded for "clean" energy. Charcoal, oil, gas, anything that guarantees the operation of the economy and the heating of homes would be by the day counted, leaving room for solar panels or propellers that kill birds in the hills and do not produce nothing electricity. Even nuclear energy, which is clean, would disappear.

Some 60 million jobs dependent on these industries would all be extinct. All industrial properties and residential properties would be adapted. The cost in billions of dollars would be paid in? They do not explain it correctly.

The state would have control of everything, as part of central Soviet planning, to resort to committees and decide all the details of the American life and economy. . She, the former bar employee, would replace the millions of economists, businessmen and experts who run the world 's most complex economy. Everything is there, in writing. Committee, that is to say Soviet, is one of the most repeated terms in the text.

Health would be socialized, a sort of SUS imposed by all nations. The state would occupy jobs, as in the Soviet Union, remembering that there were only slaves forced to work hard without any protection. Everything would be free, because this is the real cleavage between right and left: the left thinks that the state should offer free things to all, and the right thinks that people should be free to conquer their property without suffering so much. Interference from the State [19659002] The environmental mask fell, giving way to communist frowning. Issues unrelated to the environment have been added to the Green New Deal, which says a lot more about forced equality and central planning. In the Q & A section of the site, which seems more written by someone from a tupiniquim DCE, you find this real pearl that denies the whole childish mentality of these socialists:

[19659002] If the reader did not understand Well, let's go: there would be economic security for all those who can not or do not want to work. That's it! The reader has read well: if you do not want to work, the state still guarantees you an "economic security". It is the world of sensationalists and demagogues of the radical left, more and more influential in the Democratic Party. Ocasio-Cortez is treated as a rising star by the media, a darling of "popular" causes. And everything under the cloak of environmentalism, of course.

But the girl has her merit: she says that she preaches communism with all her letters. Just do not see who does not want to …

Rodrigo Constantino

[ad_2]
Source link