In an editorial, Estadão says that Ernesto Araújo's "lace" could end what remains of Brazil's good reputation in the world.

Analyzing the actions of Ernesto Araújo, the state of São Paulo criticized in an editorial the manner in which the Bolsonaro government had conducted its diplomacy. "The dark ideology that seemed until now as a foreshadowing of the retrocession of Brazilian foreign policy began to materialize as a result of the measures taken by the government of President Jair Bolsonaro. a deep reflection in the palaces of Plbadto and Itamaraty on its detrimental effects, the "change" led by chancellor Ernesto Araújo – that we could well call "crusade" – may end "

"The Brazilian government officially communicated to the United Nations (UN) last Tuesday that the country was outside the Global Compact for Immigration, which Brazil had joined on December 10. The departure of the pact, very bad in itself for the country and especially for the some 3 million Brazilians living abroad – more than double the number of foreign immigrants living here – is even worse for the reason alleged by r the government: the pact would violate national sovereignty. "

The paper explains the following reasoning:" The Marrakesh Pact has been approved by 160 of the 195 UN member countries. In early December, former Foreign Minister Aloysio Nunes defended Brazil's membership. "I approved it because it simply contains recommendations for international cooperation aimed at combating irregular migration and providing dignified treatment to migrants, including about 3 million Brazilians living abroad", said the former Minister of Foreign Affairs. That's exactly what it's all about. The full title of the agreement speaks for itself: United Nations Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration. "

And he completes" We are a nation forged by the tireless work of Brazilians and foreigners who live here in harmony and whom we see few times in other countries. Here reigns the spirit of tolerance. It is not republican to embark on a secular history of home and multiculturalism because of the ideological bias of the current government. "