[ad_1]
The Brazilian state was sentenced on July 4 by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights for the misbehavior of the case Vladimir Herzog, a journalist tortured and murdered while he was in prison. he was detained by DOI-Codi in 1975, and a suicide forged by the soldiers of the command of the second army.
The international sentence again emphasizes the lack of investigation and reparation for state crimes committed during the Brazilian dictatorial period (1964-1985) – already subject to the disapproval of the Court in 2010, about the Guerrilla episode of Araguaia.
Contrary to the position of the Inter-American Court on State Responsibilities in the face of this legacy of violence, the Amnesty Commission announced in recent weeks that it would stop promoting the public apology to the victims of the dictatorship on behalf of the Brazilian state. This decision has reinforced the process of phasing out an important pillar of public policies aimed at dealing with this history of rights violations.
Immediately after the Government's presidency of the Republic, his government exonerated the members who carried the institutional memory of the Commission. of Amnesty and named his former collaborators of the military regime. Subsequently, individual economic reparations began to be denied by the legal adviser of the Department of Justice, reversing the existing tradition since the commission's inception in 2002 that the councilors' decision was ratified by the minister.
The measures undermine the Amnesty Commission which, between 2007 and 2016, took important steps to broaden the concept of reparation, in line with the advances of the international debate. In addition to economic reparations, the agency has begun to invest in psychosocial care – through the Clinical Witness Project – and in symbolic and collective forms of reparation – such as the Amnisties Caravans, the construction of a memorial of Amnesty in Belo Horizonte (whose work has also been interrupted) and the financing of policies to promote the education of the memory and the rights of the man.
In addition to individual reparations, the Commission was taking a fundamental step, the main one being the recognition of the exceptional acts committed by the dictatorship against the Aikewara natives in 2014. As a result, the organization was moving towards a understanding
The international condemnation of Brazilian replies to the case of Vladimir Herzog restores the responsibility of the Brazilian state to offer the Brazilian state the responsibility of offering to the Brazilian state responsibility to provide citizens whose rights are violated by state agents. Restorative policies need to be considered that consider, on the one hand, the individual dimension of recovery, rehabilitation and compensation for the direct victims of state violence and, on the other hand, a more collective sense, centered on the idea of not repeating human rights violations. This dimension is more than fundamental in a country like Brazil, where the state continues to torture, execute and disappear with its citizens.
* The authors are researchers from the State Violence Research Policy Research Project of the Institute of Religious Studies (Iser)
[ad_2]
Source link
