[ad_1]
The pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson
was ordered to pay $ 4.69 billion
(SR 18 billion) to 22 women and their
families claiming that a talc sold
the group contained asbestos and caused
cancer, decided yesterday a US court
United States. The substance, which is highly
toxic, would have caused the deaths of women
due to ovarian cancer.
Asbestos is a mineral fiber that can
be found in the soil near asbestos.
It is widely used in commerce and is
banned in much of the world since
the late 1990s because of its toxicity and
to be potentially carcinogenic. For J & J
denies that talc produced in Brazil and
Asbestos in the world.
The verdict decided yesterday is the last
result of a series of thousands of actions
filed against J & J related to the
talc. According to the victims' lawyer,
Mark Lanier, a jury of six men
and six women in St. Louis, Missouri,
decided in favor of women at the end of
six weeks of testing. The court granted,
initially, a compensation of the amount
$ 550 million and $ 4.1 million
punitive damages.
Ovarian Cancer
The 22 women claim that the use of
talc for personal hygiene caused
Ovarian cancer. "For more than 40 years,
Johnson & Johnson covered the evidence
presence of asbestos in its products, "he said.
the lawyer Lanier said in a statement.
The J & J group stated that it was "deeply
disappointed with the verdict "
and emphasized that the decision to
exactly the same value to all applicants,
regardless of their
individual data and legal differences, reflects
that the evidence in the case was simply
crushed. "
The company added that several studies have shown that its talc is safe and says
that the verdict was the product of a
fundamentally unfair. "The pharmaceutical giant
faces about 9,000 lawsuits
involving the talc that it manufactures.
The agency that controls food production
and drugs, food and drugs
Administration (FDA),
asked for a study with different samples
talc, including those of J & J, between 2009 and
2010. No asbestos has been found in these
samples. But the prosecution lawyer said
in the court that the FDA and society
having used failed test methods
The previous decision was rescinded
An earlier decision of a California jury,
in October 2017, had granted
$ 417 million for a woman who
said that she had developed ovarian cancer
after using the products of the company, including
talc. However, this decision was canceled
and several other actions against J & J
must be decided.
For years, there was a fear that the use of talc, especially in neighboring areas
to the bads, increase the risk of cancer
ovarian, but the evidence is not conclusive.
The International Research Agency
about cancer clbad the use of
Talc in the bads
carcinogenic "due to contradictory evidence
Mineral Talc in its natural form
contains asbestos and causes cancer. In addition,
asbestos-free talc was used
baby products and other cosmetic products
since the 1970s. However, the
studies on asbestos-free talc
contradictory results
Other studies argue that
there is a link between the use of talc and the
Cancer. They also point out that there is no badociation
between talc in contraceptive methods,
such as diaphragms and condoms
they are getting closer to the ovaries), and cancer. Also
there does not seem to be any relationship between
the disease and the time of exposure or use,
unlike what happens with tobacco,
for example.
[ad_2]
Source link
