[ad_1]
The creation of new rules regarding the payment of housing badistance for judges is the result of an indecent novel. Despite the establishment of relatively strict standards of benefits, the judiciary has shown that it has little interest in extinguishing its culture of privilege
. may receive additional value than the judge who is transferred from his or her home county, provided that he does not own his own property in the new place.
The college still applied austerity when it applied a requirement that should be a moral requirement for any use of money. public, which is the obligation to submit a document proving the magistrate's expenses with rent.
The role of the villain goes to Minister Luiz Fux. In 2014, he signed the injunction that provided for the payment of aid to the entire judiciary. The initial argument was the need to match the benefits received in some states and by other categories.
The Fux pamphlet was used in an open manner to put pressure on the Congress and the President of the Republic to allow them to increase the salary of 16.38% collected by the judiciary. He himself had a private meeting with Michel Temer to negotiate the exchange: as soon as the readjustment was completed, the minister canceled the profit and the NYC established the new payment rules.
The reporter of the case always insisted on maintaining a gap. . He baderted that the aid was not an "unreasonable privilege" and refused to declare it unconstitutional. This detail allows the future to challenge the restrictions on benefits and to give new injunctions.
The judiciary is also prosecuted for extinguishing and regulating other people, such as food aid. In four years, judges could pretend to want to deal with the problem.
Source link
