[ad_1]
Marco Antônio Jr. TARDE SP
The Northeast occupies only eight positions in the ranking of the 500 cities with the best performance in the social development of the 5,471 municipalities of the country.The data were revealed by the Firjan index.
The study gathers data on social development, such as the level of education. employment, income, education and health. The data reinforce the great inequality of the country, where 60.2% of northern cities have low or regular development rates and the Northeast still has 50.1% of underdeveloped municipalities. In contrast, South has 98.8% of developed cities and South East 92.9%. The conclusion of Firjan's study is that, while the Midwest was distinguished by the inclusion of municipalities in this index, the North and Northeast had virtually no progress since 2006. [19659004] Two countries
By Bahia is the largest state in the Northeast, with 34% of the underdeveloped cities listed by Firjan, while the cities considered less developed are only 2, 6% in the Southeast and 1% in the Midwest. At the end of the IFDM, Firjan researchers point out that inequality is "crystallized" in the country.
"Brazil continues to be divided in two: North and Northeast with less development and South and Southeast with more development"
In addition to advances in Midwestern cities, which corresponded to the developing South, the Firjan report makes explicit the lack of good indicators in the North and Northeast regions. Meanwhile, Bahia had 35 cities that improved their indicators, followed by Piauí, with 15 municipalities, while Maranhão experienced significant deterioration.
In the same study, Firjan states that Brazil will only reach the level of development that it had before the crisis in 2013, by the year 2027. In an badysis held at the level of the US $ employment and income, the country grew by 7.6 compared to the previous index, but it was 14.6% below 2013.
Here is another study that shows the effects of the crisis between 2014 and 2016, when the country lost 6.9% of gross domestic product, with cumulative inflation of 20% over the period. The same negative indexes were considered the worst in history, leading the crisis triggered between 1930 and 1931.
Source link
