[ad_1]
WASHINGTON (AP) – Negotiations on US border security failed after Democratic Democrats from the Congress and Republican Congress clashed over the policy of detaining migrants in order to protect themselves. prevent a new ruling from the US government, said a Republican senator.
– Negotiations are now halted, Republican Senator Richard Shelby told Fox News on Sunday.
Democrats' demand to fund fewer detention centers for people detained by US immigration than the Trump government would like is a matter of contention. Republicans want to increase the number as part of their policy to accelerate the expulsion of immigrants.
Efforts to resolve the border security funding dispute were extended over the weekend to a special congressional bargaining committee, with the goal of reaching an agreement by Monday .
Mick Mulvaney, White House acting chief of staff, told the Meet the Press program on Sunday that another US government blockade was not to be ruled out.
Democratic Senator Jon Tester downplayed any break in negotiations.
– It's a negotiation. The negotiations rarely soften in the face of a lawsuit – he said on Fox's broadcast.
One of the 17 negotiators of the committee, Test, said that he hoped that an agreement would be found.
Republican Richard Shelby said the chances of reaching an agreement Monday were 50%. However, no further interviews were planned, a source told Reuters on condition of anonymity.
Members of Congress should have an agreement by Monday to allow the House of Representatives and the US Senate to approve the Finance Act for 2019, which will be signed by President Donald Trump up to ### Next Friday, when funding expires. the Department of Homeland Security and other federal agencies.
On January 25, Trump agreed to suspend the partial closure of the US government, which had already reached 35 days, without having obtained the $ 5.7 billion required by Congress to build a border wall with Mexico. The president's grant was seen as a political victory for Democrats.
Trump ended the break for three weeks to allow congressional members to agree on the search for border security, which has not yet happened been done.
Since coming to the presidency in 2016, Trump has promised to stop the flow of undocumented immigrants by building a border wall and repressing those who live illegally in the United States, by aggressively new deportations.
"Desperately Needed"
The Democrats have proposed to bring the cap of detention centers from 40,520 currently to 35,520, in exchange for giving the Republicans a portion of the money that the party seeks to erect, a source close to the negotiations.
But Democrats would still create a ceiling within this ceiling, totaling 16,500 beds in detention centers for undocumented immigrants already held in the interior of the country. The remaining vacancies would be allocated to Border Detention Centers.
Due to the internal border, US immigration officers would be forced to use to arrest and deport serious criminals, not law-abiding immigrants, as announced Sunday a party badistant in the House. Republicans, however, rejected the offer of the second ceiling made by Democrats.
Trump said Sunday that the Democratic proposal would protect criminals. "They offer very little money for the border wall that they desperately need, and now want to get out of nowhere, they want a limit for keeping convicted violent criminals in custody!", Wrote the president on Twitter .
"The allegations that this proposal would allow the release of violent criminals are false," said the Democrat Assistant.
Republican Senator Lindsey Graham criticized the limitation of the number of beds. "Donald Trump will not sign any law reducing places in detention centers – you can be sure of that," he said in Fox News's Sunday Morning Futures program.
Neither do the members of the Congressional Negotiating Committee reach a consensus on the amount of money needed to build physical barriers along the southern border of the United States.
Although an increasing number of Republicans in Congress have made it clear that they would not accept another ruling from the government, Mick Mulvaney reiterated that he could not exclude this possibility .
– Is a complete judgment completely excluded? The answer is no, "he said.
Members of Congress, however, strive to avoid a new judgment. Last week, some negotiators said that if Congress did not pbad a border security act on Friday, they would approve another funding bill to avoid a closure and have more time to conclude a bill. agreement on the border.
[ad_2]
Source link
