[ad_1]
Claro Brasil – NET, Claro and Embratel – asked Anatel to resume the discussion on fixed Internet franchises in Brazil. The intention of the company is that the agency publishes the monthly limit with the justification that operators can exercise "freedom of choice in business models".
For Claro, the prohibition to impose a restriction on the use of broadband entails limitations. (19659003) In 2016, the National Telecommunications Agency (ANATEL) had suspended the existence of fixed Internet franchises by operators,
The intention of the group of operators is that the agency conducts regulatory impact badyzes to verify the economic and legal effects of establishing monthly broadband franchises.
Economy and Market
Dec 21
<img src = "http://css.tudocdn.net/new_files/ img / shim.gif "data-src =" https://t.tudocdn.net/367144?w=115&h=95 "alt =" NET and Claro TV launch an ab signal Anatel tends to make a decision about it in 2019, under the responsibility of the current president of the agency, Leonardo Euler of […] Morais
One of the supporters of the monthly limits is the new chairman of Vivo, Christian Gebara [19659009] Do not rush for 5G
Given the priority given to the return of franchises in fixed broadband, Claro always stated that they do not want to rush for deployment in the 5G in the country. the group, the revision of Resolution 537/2010 – on the frequency of 3.5 GHz – should only be carried out after the maturity of the equipment sector and the s devices.
You then understand that the operators must have the return of the franchises, or the precautionary measures of Anatel must remain? Share your opinion with us!
Source link