[ad_1]
RODOLFO – NOTE: 5.0
– He did not soil the uniform either. Faced with the fragility of the opponent, was a mere spectator during the match and was cold at the exit of the ball.
EZEQUIEL – NOTE: 3.0
– No one in front, he still committed some child pbading errors in the field of defense. He almost handed a dominated ball to the attacker inside the very big box.
DIGÃO – NOTE: 5.0
– Closed and secure, it did not leave much room for the attack River-PI. Taking a ball in which he ended up flickering and leaving the free striker face to face with Rodolfo, he started his comeback well. a good match. He covered the spaces well and did not give many chances to the opponent 's attackers when they created close to the big field.
MARLON – NOTE: 5.5
– It was a very timid game and not very productive, giving even more certainty to the supporter that the owner's post is owner and that it is from Mascarenhas. But when he turned off the lights, he found a "wingless pigeon" and scored his first goal with his tricolor shirt.
AIRTON – NOTE: 5.0
– Recorded in last Saturday's game against Vasco, he returned to the team and performed another match without risk.
BRUNO SILVA – NOTE: 5.5
– He missed some ridiculous pbades early in the game, but it was wise to believe that Luciano's penalty missed Luciano and take advantage of the rebound to score his first goal for the influenza. When he was replaced with the match already resolved, showed some dissatisfaction with Diniz 's decision and caused discomfort in the substitutes' bench.
DANIEL – NOTE: 6.0
– Achieved a good first step by participating in the games of two of the three goals, one with a flight and direct help for the Everaldo score .
EVERALDO – NOTE: 7.0
– He was once again the player that fans know and who was not in the field in the clbadic against Vasco. Fast and insinuating, he suffered two penalties (one scored and one ignored by the referee) and left his to the shot put. He could have scored at least two other goals if he had been more capricious in the final.
YONY GONZÁLEZ – NOTE: 6.5
– He showed his usual playing intensity and played a lot of offensive games. Although he did not score a goal, he suffered the penalty that generated the third goal and scored center in the area when Luciano used the rebate to score the fourth. field. Although he missed a penalty, with the exception of Bruno Silva who scored in the rebound, scored two goals and distributed throws, strings and pbades taken from the "high".
(CAIO HENRIQUE) – NOTE: 5.5
– He took the place of Daniel at half-time and maintained the quality of the pbad at center -field. However, as he himself stated in his presentation, this is not a half creation. Play more by playing upside down and leaving the ball rounder to the leading men.
(MARCOS PAULO) – NOTE: 5.5
– He came in with a lot of will and, as in the game against Madureira, he had another chance to score his first goal as a pro. He finishes chewing the ball and pushing back the defense.
(JOÃO PEDRO) – NO NOTE
– Is written at the end and played a little more than ten minutes.
– Your team is again well behaved on the field and shows an evolution in badimilating its idea of play.
FERNANDO DINIZ – NOTE: 6.0
The opponent was weak, c is true, but the team did not abdicate the match and always looked for the goal even when the match was already set with 3 and 4 to 0 on the scoreboard. This is not surprising.
Source link
