[ad_1]
In conclusion, the Paraná Federal Prosecutor's Office reports that there is "a lot of documentary evidence" according to which former President Lula was "the de facto owner and owner" of the Atibaia website . The 366-page document, signed by 12 Republican prosecutors members of Lava Jato's working group, reiterates the demand for a new conviction of the PT.
Lula has been imprisoned since April 7, sentenced to 12 years and one month in prison for corruption and money laundering in the Guarujá triplex process.
"The various pieces of evidence prove that Lula was the owner of the facts and the owner of the site of Atibaia.In this state, Fernando Bittar authorized and participated in the realization of hidden and hidden works for Lula held on the site by Bumlai, Odebrecht and OEA ", says Lava Jato
The Attorney General's office indicates that the remodeling and improvement of the site would have been ensured by subcontractors Odebrecht and OAS as a The property is the center of the third criminal action of Lava Jato, in Paraná, against the former president.The PTB is still accused of bribery and money laundering for alleged bribes. -vin in Odebrecht – a plot that would house the Lula Institute and an apartment next to the residence of the former president in São Bernardo do Campo.
Lava Jato states that The site was the subject three reforms: one under the command of cattle rancher José Carlos Bumlai, in the amount of R $ 150,000, another from Odebrecht, R $ 700,000 and a third transformation of the kitchen by the OAS, R $ 170,000 in a total of R $ 1.02 million.
The site of Atibaia bears the name of the entrepreneur Fernando Bittar, son of Jacó Bittar, longtime friend of the former president. According to Lava Jato, the "entrepreneur" gave Lula and his family the opportunity to use the Atibaia website as they liked it best. "
"Such a circumstance – the loan of the property by Fernando Bittar to Lula and Marisa so that they use it as they please – confirms the denunciation that, without prejudice to the exercise by Fernando Bittar attributes property, Lula and Marisa Letícia acted and used the place as owners, ie they behaved like de facto owners and
"In addition to the Oral evidence gathered in the procedural instruction, as it is stated in the complaint (chapter "V.1.1.1 – Owners and Owners of Sítio de Atibaia), it was collected a great deal documentary evidence showing that Lula and Marisa Leticia behaved as de facto owners and owners of Sítio de Atibaia (though shared with Bittar)
The Ministry The federal public accuses Lula of 10 offenses of pbadive bribery and 44 other money laundering offenses. Lava Jato also calls for the conviction of the businessman and prosecutor, Marcelo Odebrecht, and the OAS-related executive, Agenor Franklin Magalhães Martins, for active bribery, and l & # 39; 39, former President of the OAS, José Adelmário Pinheiro, and Leo Pinheiro, for active bribery and money laundering. . The Federal Public Prosecutor 's Office also requests, for money laundering, the conviction of the cattle farmer José Carlos Bumlai and the former counselor of the lawyer Rogério Aurélio Pimentel, the l'. businessman Emílio Odebrecht, lawyer Roberto Teixeira, businessman Fernando Bittar and four other people [1965900]. Prosecutors attached a receipt in the amount of 120,000 rand, in the name of Fernando Bittar and endorsed by a representative of Kitchen Kitchens.
According to Lava Jato, the projects and the Kitchens bill were in the name of Fernando Bittar & # 39; with the intention of the sole source of concealment and concealment of the nature, the l & # 39; origin, location, disposition, movement and ownership of values stemming from previous crimes, hiding the origin of values and those responsible for payment, as well as the true beneficiary of the reform in this case, "
" The Federal Prosecutor's Office attaches the attached documents, excerpted from Paulo Gordilho's electronic badysis, pointing out from the outset that they constitute prior access to the defenses ", specified Lava Jato loss of proceeds and proceeds of crime, or their equivalent, including amounts stuck in bank accounts and investments and amounts in kind seized in accordance with search and seizure warrants of an equal amount or more than 155,378,202.04 R $.
Sentence Calculation
In the document, Lava Jato notes that "the crime of bribery is a very difficult crime to discover and when it is discovered, it is difficult to prove. Prosecutors note that "even when proven, the difficulties of handling" white collar crimes "in Brazil are notorious, so sanctions are not always sanctioned."
"We are facing the 39, one of the most important cases of corruption revealed in the country.It can not be treated as a criminal offense.Current criminal action without precaution, because the message to society can be disastrous: impunity; "[19659011] "If we want a country free of corruption, it must act as a high-risk crime and a strong punishment, which relies on a consistent performance of the judiciary in this sense, [] 19659002] Documentary evidence of Lava Jato against Lula in the case of the Atibaia site
– "The number of times and time and time again that Lula and her family visited the Atibaia site, on the basis of the data provided by the central toll and daily taxes v by the Federal Administration to the Lula Security Guards on Trips to Atibaia
– Several emails from the Lula Institute proving its use the enjoyment of the Atibaia site by the Lula family mentioning:
(i ) plan of surveillance cameras of the Atibaia site with reference to cases (19659002) (iii) map of the city of Atibaia in support of the Lula security plan
(iv) installation of # 39; a purification station on the site,
(v) domestic animals of the Lula family;
(vi) Marisa Letícia's interesting lunch menu on the site,
(vii) presence on the site on the eve of the end-of-year festivities, with the presence of the Lula security guards;
viii) questions relating to the day-to-day management of the homemade Maradona site with LULA's warranties, such as lists of construction materials required for the interventions; receipts for real estate purchases; – report on domestic animals (fish, chickens, duck, peabad, etc.), etc.
– Expert report no. 0392/2016-SETEC / SR / DPF / PR131, from the search and seizure carried out on the Atibaia website, which indicates that there were various personal belongings belonging to Lula and Marisa Leticia;
– A considerable part of
– Tax notes in the name of Marisa Letícia and Lula security agents concerning property found on the site of Atibaia, as well as documents relating to the presence of Lula , after leaving the presidential term, were destined for the Sítio de Atibaia;
– Receipts and documents relating to the work done by José Carlos Bumlai and Odebrecht for the benefit of Lula, seized at his home
– Acts of Sale and Sale of the Sítio de Atibaia after having acquitted Lula and Marisa Letícia shows that the couple had the intention to consolidate the property on his behalf. "
Source link
