[ad_1]
| Photo: Photo: AFP Archives / Yasuyoshi Chiba
|
The collaboration agreements signed by Odebrecht with the São Paulo prosecutors and involving crimes in São Paulo, revealed in the Lava Jato operation, are disputed within the Public Prosecutor's Office (MPE). The reason is the benefits granted to the entrepreneur in exchange for returning the overdue money and any evidence against the public officials involved. So far, none of the five agreements signed with the Public Prosecution since December 2017 has been ratified by the court or the Superior Council of the agency.
Among the objects questioned are the payments of the agreed indemnities, with values considered as low and for an extended period of time (22 years), allowing the compensation to be made with a discount of the future public works awarded by Odebrecht to São Paulo , and the possibility for the entrepreneur to take over a contract of 503 million reais with the mayor of the capital – Roberto Marinho Tunnel Avenue – that the company's executives have acknowledged to have won through the training of & # 39; Agreements and the payment of tips. The contract was signed in 2011, but it is suspended due to lack of funding – the work has not started.
Baptisms of the Agreement of Adjustment and Moderation (TAC), the agreements were signed by a group of seven promoters of Public and Social Heritage and involve five public officials, among them the l '. former mayor of the capital and Minister of Communications, Gilberto Kbadab (PSD), accused of receiving R $ 21.2 million in cash 2 between 2008 and 2014, and the engineer Paulo Vieira de Souza, former director of Dersa, accused to have received 5% of the company's monthly payments for road works between 2007 and 2010.
The agreements were proposed by Odebrecht himself after the São Paulo prosecutors refused to join at the leniency agreement concluded in December 2016 by the contractor with the prosecutors of the Federal Public Prosecutor (MPF) – they did not agree with the absence of the government in the pact. Without membership, they did not have access to the evidence presented by the 78 executives informing the prosecutors of the Lava Jato working group.
In December of last year, a group led by Attorney Silvio Marques began signing agreements with Odebrecht
In December of last year, a group led by Attorney Silvio Marques started signing agreements with Odebrecht. defending that they are needed to recover money and collect evidence against corrupt officials. The executives were called to testify and confirmed the allegations made to the MPF. And the company is committed to pay, in the five agreements signed so far, 42.6 million reais.
"Without Effective Evidence"
In one of the signed collaborations, involving the participation of all parties involved in the proceedings, R $ 200,000 of tuition in Elton Santa Fé Zacarias, former Secretary of Infrastructure of São Paulo and current Executive Secretary of the Ministry of Communications, to release the construction site of the tunnel Roberto Marinho in 2011, Judge Fausto José Martins Seabra, of the 3rd Court of Public Finance , rejected the request for approval. The magistrate alleged that the seal of agreement at this stage of the proceedings was "premature" and that the charges laid "rest mainly on the unilateral report of the members of the construction company" without "effective evidence and documentary of the payment of the undue advantage. "
On the other hand, four other Public Heritage promoters who conduct at least eight Odebrecht investigations do not agree with the terms proposed and refuse to sign similar agreements with the contractor, who has already warned that he would not cooperate with these investigations.
The articles were also criticized by lawyers heard by the newspaper O Estado de S. Paulo. "We need a minimum guarantee of evidence because the benefit offered to Odebrecht is immediate," said Luiz Flávio Gomes. The information comes from the newspaper O Estado de S. Paulo
[ad_2]
Source link
