Olavo de Carvalho makes serious accusations against Mourão and Bolsonaro must pronounce



[ad_1]

The philosopher Olavo de Carvalho was considered by many to be a sort of "guru" of President Bolsonaro, an idea reinforced by the presence of his book in the president's first statement after the electoral victory. The symbolism was obvious because they had only three other books in the pile, including the Bible. In addition, at least two ministers were chosen after appointing Olavo, and one of his students became a kind of Chancellor of the Republic of B in Itamaraty, as the PT had appointed to Marco Aurélio Garcia. The argument that Olavo is or claims to be a Rasputin of the elected president does not seem crazy.

And it is precisely for this reason, given the apparent weight that the opinion of the philosopher of Virginia has on Bolsonaro, that it has the moral obligation to pronounce after the very Serious accusations brought by Olavo against Vice President Mourão. The fact that Mourão slipped is something that I have also pointed out. I even warned that vanity was a danger and that the praises of the left and the press were tactical and hypocritical, simply because Mourão was not in command. But then, the accusation of open conspiracy against the president goes very far, the one that Olavo decided to overthrow. Here are some comments that he made:

Mourão, you proved that you had the courage to fight a man with an open belly in a hospital bed.

All those who plot against Bolsonaro during his stay in the hospital are psychopaths killers. Does the Mourão plan to get rid of Bolsonaro and use his election as a mere camouflage to give a voice of electoral legitimacy to a coup of the military state?

Mourão
(1) gives serious airs to Jean Wyllys' silly little lies about the "threats" that he receives (from a mad condemned man who I've already threatened, Joice Hbadelmann).
(3) He thinks of giving an honorable exit to a dictator whom people want to see in prison or in the cemetery
(19659007) (2) He tried to give a tribune to Lula, who took it rejected. the right to abortion, that the Bolsonaro election campaign announced the prohibition to ban.
(5) He speaks badly of a minister and wants to investigate another minister, but does not seem in a hurry to discover the leaders of Adélio
What is missing

The Mourão obviously considers himself as the superior authority of the president because he is above him in the military and Masonic hierarchy ]

I repeat: he is Legitimate to think that Mourão went too far in the role of deputy, but what he ignores, is that he does not even give any science to the Brazilians. Olavo says that it is something very different: he accuses Mourão of conspiring to overthrow Bolsonaro, two long-time friends and, remember, Bolsonaro chose Mourão to replace him. It is even ironic to see Olavo and the Olavetes disregarding the role of the MP and claiming that voters voted in Bolsonaro, not Mourão, while we remember that they played against the PTs who had elected Michel Temer (and were right, of course). 19659002] The vice president was the direct choice of the president, Bolsonaro and Mourão. Everyone therefore knows that he has always enjoyed a long friendship and mutual trust. Olavo makes very serious denunciations without any concrete proof, but on the basis of minor conclusions. Criticizing Mourão for unfortunate statements, I repeat, is a legitimate and even necessary thing. But to declare this war open and to ask the leader of the deputy, to create an additional intrigue in an already divided government and to have to adopt fundamental reforms, seems to be a real treason. On which side is Olavo de Carvalho? Who really plays against Brazil?

Bolsonaro may ignore the "beards" traded for several reasons, among which might think that Olavo does not deserve as much attention as that, or prefer to hope that the climate calms down. But, while he himself leveled Olavo, intent on mixing Bolonarism with Olavism in a badtail almost indistinguishable from each other, he has a moral duty to pronounce and reject the suspicions of his vice. . The alternative is a complicit silence, which will give legitimacy to the attacks of his "guru".

Rodrigo Constantino

[ad_2]
Source link