[ad_1]
The Araújo pharmacy was ordered to pay a fine of R $ 7,930,801.72 for conditioning discounts to the consumer's CPF at the time of purchase, without providing clear and adequate information on consumer registration.
The conviction decision comes from the National Program for the Protection and Defense of Consumers (Procon) of the Office of the Attorney General of Minas Gerais (MPMG). It was made after the investigation into the facts and the company's refusal to adjust the behavior.
TEMPO the pharmacy said that she had not yet received any notification from the body.
According to the Code of Consumer Protection, the opening of a registration, registration, registration and personal and consumer data must be communicated in writing to the consumer, if they do not ask for it.
In administrative procedures, the promoter "The main objective of the loyalty program says is to capture and capture the CPF of consumers and not to develop a program of benefits or loyalty in itself", he declared.
The prosecutor also pointed out that the words "capture" and "capture" CPF of consumption appeared in the internal documents of the company
. ] In the sentencing decision, the consumer protection agency also questions the security of information and the confidentiality of the databases, because the
In the decision, the prosecutor emphasizes that the security systems, even advanced, are vulnerable and are not immune to attacks, as has been the case for large companies around the world. According to Abreu, the consumer is the most vulnerable ", especially the one who has been registered with the mere insertion of his FCP and ignores his consumption habits and his history of acquisition of drugs and products
In the decision, he explains that "the constant capture of consumer habits in a hidden way and without prior information represents a serious risk to the privacy and the privacy of the consumer, in addition to subjecting him to the risks of
. For example, drug purchase records, for example, may be used by a health plan operator or an insured.
Araújo
In response to a report from [
] Araújo
Araújo
In response to a report from TEMPO the company indicated that it was not 39, had not yet received notification from the Attorney General's Office and that she was not commenting on the decisions rendered in the case.
The pharmacy also stated "that she would call in. MP, as soon as he is informed."
[ad_2]
Source link
