Queiroz had to repay R $ 16,800 after obtaining irregular education assistance and responded to the lawsuit filed in Alerj | New Orleans hotels

Nathália Queiroz, counselor of Bolsonaro, was a personal trainer. Nathália was also employed in the offices of Flávio, then in the shorthand company of Alerj. returned to the office of the son of the current President of the Republic, Jair Bolsonaro (PSL). At the time, she had studied physical education at the University of Castelo Branco during the afternoon.

The G1 had access to the investigation through the Access to Information Act (ATIA), upon request made in December and granted the next month.

Irregular renewal in the middle of a scandal

The irregularity of the education aid of Nathália Queiroz, according to the lawsuit filed in Alerj, is due to the fact that the benefit may only be paid to dependents who are not employed. For three periods, Fabrício perceived the relative benefit to Nathalia while she was working:

• from 20/09/2007 to 04/03/2008
• from 03/11/2008 to 01/02/2011
• From 01 / 04/2011 to 01/08/2011

On March 4, 2008, Alerj ordered the cancellation of all educational aids for the employees of the house through of "Fraud Exchange". The poor with many children were hired as "ghosts" so that contracting contractors could get the salary and / or the money from the help.

Under popular pressure, Alerj decided to use a fine-toothed comb for his benefit. MEPs felt that in order to apply for new aid or to renew it, officials had to sign a document stating that they knew all the conditions to obtain it. Among them, the inability of the recipient to find a job to benefit from the help.

On the 11th of this month, exactly one week after the cancellation of the benefit, Queiroz asked him for it again. Less than a month later, on April 9, he signed the statement that he knew the rules for obtaining help.

At that time, Queiroz had three children enrolled in the benefit and received the same number of allowances. Each of R $ 447.25 – is the equivalent of R $ 835 currently, adjusted by the IPCA. Queiroz was a CAI-16 advisor, whose current salary is R $ 5,486.76.

In a statement made in 2012, nearly four years after the renewal of Nathalia's Irregular Education Grant, Fabrício said that he was not paying attention to what he was doing. he had signed.

Flávio Bolsonaro's counselor cited "correria"

. The argument was also used by the lawyer who defended it, according to Queiroz's statement:

(Fabrício said) who signed the application without observing the printed text; "

The case was badyzed by the Standing Committee on Administrative Procedure of Alerj, who suggested the return of the money and sent the recommendation to the first secretary of the House. (19659007) According to the words of Deputy Attorney General Alerj, "the existence of good faith … is a violation of the right to a fair trial. very doubtful. "The notice indicates that the renewal of the benefit was requested soon after the cancellation and that he signed a document.

" In addition to omitting a fact determining for the Cancellation of the benefit that he collects, he made a false statement to the Administration of the House.

However, at the end of the proceedings, the board understands that "there was no bad faith on the part of the accused, but negligence".

"It is one of a police server who was asked to work as security guard of the deputy Flávio Bolsonaro in 2007 and since then works more in the street than in the office and that, for this reason, all (…) was made by the employees of the cabinet and that he did that only sign and, in particular, in the event that this procedure generates this procedure, he declares to have signed "in a hurry". "

Queiroz" does not agree with the papers, "said the lawyer

Queiroz's lawyer at l & rsquo; He stated that, since he was Prime Minister, Flávio Bolsonaro's advisor was someone who "has absolutely no regular contract with the papers, subjective requirement to be considered". He adds that the customer corrected the error by collecting it three years later.

In a recent interview with the SBT, justifying the atypical approach emphasized by Coaf, Queiroz said that he was "a businessman".

"I am a businessman I earn money I do it, then I buy, review, buy, review I buy a car, I'm looking at a car, I've always been like that. "Still."

Girl: Queiroz did not read the signature a

In August 2012, Nathália Melo de Queiroz also testified after being summoned. She was heard as a witness and, according to the hearing, began working for Flávio Bolsonaro in 2007.

She was exonerated in February 2011 and became, two months later, a parliamentary advisor to the shorthand of Alerj. Then he went back to work with Bolsonaro. At the hearing, he stated that he did not remember exactly when. And defended his father.

"(Nathália) He replied that his father had never acted in bad faith and that he usually signed documents without reading," he said, according to one extracts.

According to Alerj's judgment panel, the case was discovered in 2011 when Fabrizio attempted to renew Nathalia's educational aid and, instead of giving his own registration number, provided him that of Nathalia.

The server of the Department of Personnel Administration who badisted him noticed the distraction and realized that, since Nathália was an employee of Alerj, he could not receive help with education. This same server advised Fabrizio to correct the error and the latter requested the cancellation of the irregular service by opening the investigation.

"The fact that he presented himself before the DAP (personal administrative service) to renew his performance and provide the registration of his daughter (…), by mistake, served in the discovery of the error, then, led by the server Leonardo (…), the accused was admitted in the present case, requesting the cancellation of profit, received irregularly, "concluded the commission.

The "undue discounts" referred to by the Queiroz defense constitute an appendix to the lawsuit in which he seeks the annulment of the surrender of Rioprevidência. That's because he, who is a military police officer, was "loaned" to Flavio's office. However, the reduction in social security occurred on both salaries.

"On the other hand (Alerj), he also benefited from undue discounts." Compensation was paid and it was acknowledged that it was not in bad faith. If compensation was paid for improperly discounted amounts, there was none, "argues the defense.

Until Thursday (17), the Financial Control Board ( Coaf) was investigating Queiroz for atypical treatment of R $ 1.2 million in his bank account for one year without clarification, but the investigation procedure was temporarily suspended by decision of the TST Minister Luiz Fux, at the request of Flávio Bolsonaro

The decision of Fux was taken in the performance of his duties and must be presented to Minister Marco Aurelio Melo on February 1. On the "Blog of Andréia Sadi ", he said he sent garbage like Flávio.