[ad_1]
A study conducted by the Dutch Consumer Association revealed serious flaws in the facial recognition systems of 42 smartphones currently available on the market. The tests used pictures of the original owners of the handsets, printed in high quality, with devices such as Lenovo, Huawei, Asus, Nokia, Sony and Samsung disapproved.
In total, 110 devices were tested by the institution, which protects the rights of consumers in the European country, experimenting with color photos and also in black and white. One of the strangest conclusions is that regional variants or versions with different specifications, for example, may have security problems or do not belong to the same device model.
This is the case, for example, Moto G6 Play. has been deprecated in tests, while the clbadic editions of the device as well as the Plus version have been approved. In theory, they all use the same biometric technology and this should not happen. Another finding is that, in most cases, the latest models have done better than the old ones, the Galaxy A7 and A8, for example, having been frowned upon, while the printed photos do not fool the A9. .
National version aircraft are also included in both lists. The case cited under the name of Moto G6 Play concerning its big brothers, for example, happened with the Brazilian editions of the devices, while the smartphones Samsung Galaxy J8, and Moto E5, are part of the disapproved ones during the tests, [19659002] Overall, however, Apple was the only company to have been approved on all devices tested, the iPhone XR, XS and XS Max thus preventing unlocking through images. Similarly, three brands have been disapproved in their entirety with the Nokia 3.1, the Xiaomi Mi A2 and its variants, and the BlackBerry Key2, which are unsafe.
In some cases, the consumer badociation has found additional security settings. which intensified the verification and released six smartphones (Honor 7e models and all versions of LG's G7, V35 and V40) from the chess list. In other cases, bugs could also occur, as in the case of OnePlus 6, which proved easier to solve than the image immediately after a successful verification by the user himself.
The survey suggests that most manufacturers are telling customers that facial recognition is not the safest alternative since sensitive data needs to be protected in some other way. Nevertheless, the outlook is positive, despite the presence of high-popularity devices in the list, as the new versions have proven to be better, which shows that the technology is changing.
Check the complete list published by the body:
Approved
Disapproved
Source: Dutch Consumer Association, The Register
[ad_2]
Source link
