[ad_1]
A report by the O Globo newspaper, which highlighted the "contradictory information" on death, presented the hypothesis that Sabrina had forged the form of a suicide and was a victim of suicide. was endowed with a new identity. Already, texts from Carta Capital magazine and Hypeness quoted the opinions of her relatives on the possibility of a "symbolic death", invented to stop the threats against her and her family.
Work to prove that this woman forged death to be alive, that is to put the head back in a guillotine.
Nothing could be more irresponsible. If death is real, the lack of respect for the pain of this family is, to say the least, insensitive. If this is not the case, to prove that this woman has forged her death to be able to continue living is to put her head back in a guillotine, the blade ready to dive.
Like me, all the journalists who stayed in touch with her – who did it before. send messages daily on WhatsApp via a mailing list – they knew how much she feared for her life. Yet the hypothesis that she lied about her own death seems far more plausible than the possibility that this woman who had been threatened for months and touched the subject the same day was murdered. 19659005] Printing messages sent by Sabrina Bittencourt to journalists a few hours before publishing a suicide letter on Facebook
Printing messages sent by Sabrina Bittencourt to journalists a few hours before publishing a suicide letter on Facebook
The news of Sabrina's death was announced about three weeks after we talked about a video call. I had never seen or heard such an exhausted person. Isolated in a corner of the world, she counts the denunciations she received. their full-time dedication to welcoming victims; the incessant threats against her and her family; and constant change to avoid being spotted by those who threatened it.
His suicide is a kind of murder. Those responsible are those who threatened to kill her.
In these circumstances, his suicide is no less a kind of murder. Those responsible are those who threatened to kill her. They did it. But when she embarks on the badumption of a falsified death without it being of any benefit to society, the press builds not only a crime without authors, but also, as a friend leases me. 39, said, a crime without victims.
On December 13, 2018, Sabrina denies having learned that she had committed suicide at the time and claims that she is "at the limit" and that she will not tolerate not the "vulture reporter".
What is the goal? What is the purpose of calling consulates, embbadies and harbading the only member of Sabrina's family to decide the case – a boy of 16 – knowing that putting his life in danger (if it always has one) is the only possible way out
This journalism that cleans the hands of its consequences, blinded by the utopian quest for an unshakable (non-existent) objectivity, does not interest me. He is irresponsible and a rock star. Your advocates can say, "It's our job to look for the facts, whatever they are, and report them to the public." I refute: even if the only possible impact of his work is to facilitate the murder of a woman?
