[ad_1]
The fourth panel of the STJ (Superior Court of Justice) unanimously rejected Thursday (6) two appeals from the heirs of Princess Isabel (1846-1921), who demanded the return of the Guanabara Palace, which now sits in the government .
The case is considered the oldest of the Brazilian judiciary. It has been going on since 1895. The heirs of Princess Isabel and her husband, Conde d 'Eu (1842-1922), argued that the Brazilian government had
by 4 votes against 0 , the ruling of the State of Rio de Janeiro is upheld, recognizing that the royal family had control of the property for use and housing purposes. but this property has always belonged to the state.
Ministers Antonio Carlos Ferreira, rapporteur for resources, Raul Araújo, Isabel Gallotti and Marco Buzzi voted in this regard. Resources examined whether the Guanabara Palace was included, at the time of proclamation of the republic, between the private holdings of the royal family or whether it was a public good.
The members of the Orleans and Bragança family demand the restitution of the property and the recognition of the domination of the successors of Princess Isabel.
According to the STJ, in 123 years of litigation, several court cases have rendered rulings, including the reopening of the debate. after the closure in the 1960s.
The lawsuit states that the palace of Guanabara "was acquired specifically for the habitation of His Royal and Imperial Highnesses and that a patrimony was founded on lands belonging to the Nation ( Article 8 of the marriage contract of "
On 18 July 1991 Decree No 447 was published which incorporated all the badets constituting the dowry or badets of the Union into the badets of the The Union The Rio Court of Justice had already rejected the appeals that the palace be permanently incorporated into the patrimony of the Union.
Source link