[ad_1]
The question of which phone is equipped with the best camera is endless and in many ways purely subjective. Speaking here, we come to a point in mobile photography where any device purchased (above a certain value, of course) will offer quite satisfying results.
Since this is so, why not a blind test so that separate devices to deal with ongoing and fun battles? That's exactly what YouTuber Brownlee Brands (on MKBHD ) did … and the results were not very good for iPhones as you can see above. YouTuber was ambitious: he selected 16 relatively new handsets and set up a knockout system, putting the candidates in square brackets (think of the final stages of the World Cup) and excluding the losers of each round until the big winner. The jury? Not less than the millions of Brownlee followers who voted for the best photo in every conflict on Instagram and Twitter – all without knowing which camera had taken each photo.
BlackBerry KEY2
The Apple devices selected for the competition were the iPhone XS and the iPhone of X . In the first round, they beat the BlackBerry Key2 and the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 … and, ashamed (or not), both were beaten in the popular polls!
Pocophone F1
Brownlee highlighted these two results among others: smartphones Pixel (2 and 3) were also eliminated in the initial phase, for on LG V40 . ] and for Huawei P20 Pro respectively. Pocophone was crushing in the votes, exceeding in the following phases the Galaxy Note9 and nothing less than RED Hydrogen (yes, the smartphone dedicated to photography by the famous camcorder manufacturer ); Only in the final, he was beaten by the great champion, Huawei Mate 20 .
I recommend watching the video because it was really fun but – spoiler alert – there we have the final results of the contest:
Brownlee took the results into account. The vote took place via Twitter and Stories on Instagram, two platforms that greatly compress images and significantly reduce their quality. Therefore, a number of important points in the badysis of the quality of a photo (level of detail, noise, sharpness) become less visible and the public tends to compare two specific aspects: brightness and the contrast. The most advanced devices in the soundings are precisely those that display the most powerful treatment, with images brighter and more saturated … but not necessarily those of better quality, according to him.
However, I make a counterpoint: to make specific exceptions. Most of us use our camera phones to take photos that will be posted on Instagram or Twitter. The results have validity: if people saw these photos on these platforms and found them more attractive, then maybe Apple (and other manufacturers who would not have it) would benefit from thinking about these aspects, and not only in the degree of realism of the photo.
And what do you think about it
via 9to5Mac
[ad_2]
Source link
