[ad_1]
Being the world's richest man ($ 130 billion) was not enough to let Jeff Bezos, founder and CEO of Amazon and owner of The Washington Post at the Safe from threats. In this case, an alleged attempt of blackmail and extortion. On January 9, he announced on Twitter his separation from Mackenzie Bezos, with whom he has four children and a marriage of 26 years. Immediately after, the sensational vehicle The National Enquirer published 11 pages on the extramarital affair of Bezos and Laura Sanchez, a businesswoman and former TV presenter. This week, the mega-entrepreneur has opened an even deeper story. Bezos entered the ring. And it showed that more than just photos and intimate messages, there were ingredients that came to Donald Trump. "The New York Times says" that he was not becoming the richest man in the world by refusing to do what it took to win, and that the man of Business was showing the same motivation that helped him turn a simple idea – the sale of books on the Internet – into a $ 780 billion multi-unit factory. "It attacked American Media exactly where it hurts – its unstable legal position.If American Media violates any law, any law would violate an agreement with federal prosecutors in New York." was concluded in September after American Media admitted to having paid in the 2016 presidential campaign to protect Donald J. Trump against allegations of a case, under which the company would not be sued for his Trump-related efforts, provided he has no legal problems for the next three years, and Bezos' first big shot in the fight was given on Thursday (8) in his account in Medium in a text entitled "No thanks, Mr. Pecker." The following is the full ticket that already has more than 207,000 "I like."
There has happened something to me. unusually yesterday In fact, for me it was not just usual, it was the first time. I made an offer that I could not refuse. Or at least that is what the people of the command of the National Enquirer thought. I'm glad they thought it, because it encouraged them to put everything in writing. Instead of giving in to extortion and blackmail, I decided to publish exactly what they had sent me, despite personal costs and embarrbadment.
AMI, the owner of the National Enquirer, led by David Pecker, recently entered into an immunity agreement with the Justice Department spoke of his role in the so-called Catch and Kill process on behalf of President Trump and his election campaign. Mr. Pecker and his company have also been investigated for various actions they have taken in favor of the Saudi government.
And sometimes Mr. Pecker mixes everything:
"After Mr. Trump became president, he rewarded Pecker's loyalty to a dinner at the White House for which the media officer invited a guest with important ties to royalty in Saudi Arabia, at the time, Mr. Pecker was doing business while seeking funding for acquisitions … "
Bezos publishes here a link to account for the of the New York Times
. Federal investigators and legitimate media, of course, suspect and prove that Mr. Pecker used the investigator and the MIAM for political reasons. And yet, the AMI continues to claim the opposite:
"The US media categorically rejects any claim that their reporting would have been governed, dictated, or influenced in any way by outside, political, or other forces. . "
I did not know much about it a few weeks ago when my private messages were published in the National Enquirer. I engaged investigators to find out how these messages had been obtained and to determine why many unusual actions had been undertaken by Enquirer. Several independent surveys are currently examining this topic.
To conduct my investigation, I kept Gavin from Becker. I have known M. de Becker for twenty years. His experience in this field is excellent and he is one of the smartest and most knowledgeable leaders I know. I asked him to give priority to protecting my time because I prefer to work on other things and use the budget I need to investigate the facts about it.
Background: Owning the Washington Post is a complication for me. It is inevitable that some powerful people who suffer under the cover of the Washington Post mistakenly conclude that I am their enemy. President Trump is one of those people, which is clear from his many tweets. In addition, Post's critical and relentless coverage of the murder of columnist Jamal Khashoggi is undoubtedly unpopular in some circles.
(Although The Post is a complication for me, I have no regrets about my investment, it is a critical institution with a critical mission, I will be very proud of the administration of the Post and of support your steadfast mission at age 90. I look at my life if you are lucky enough to live so long, no matter how complex it is for me.)
Back to History: A few days ago , an AMI officer informed us that Mr. Pecker was "apoplectic" about our investigation. For reasons that still need to be better understood, the Saudi question seems to strike a particularly sensitive nerve.
A few days after hearing about Pecker 's apoplexy, we were first solicited verbally with a proposal. They said that they would have more SMS and photos to post if they would not interrupt our investigation.
My attorneys argued that the AMI did not have the right to post photos because anyone who owns the copyright of their own photos.
The AMI press statement is that the photos are needed to show Amazon shareholders that my trading decisions are bad. I founded Amazon in my garage 24 years ago and I personally took parcels to the post office. Today, Amazon employs more than 600,000 people and has just completed the most profitable year ever, even investing heavily in new initiatives. It is usually between the number 1 and the fifth most profitable group in the world. I will let these results speak for themselves.
Well, back to your threat to publish my photos intimate. I think we (my lawyers and Gavin de Becker) have not reacted with fear to the threat. They sent it:
From: Howard, Dylan [[email protected]] (Chief Content Officer, AMI)
(19659002) Subject: Photos by Jeff Bezos and Ms. Lauren Sanchez
CONFIDENTIAL AND NOT DISTRIBUTED (19659002) Subject: Photos of Jeff Bezos and Mrs. Lauren Sanchez
Marty:
I leave the office.
However, in order to speed up this situation and publish rumors not based on The National Enquirer in the Washington Post, I would like to describe the photos you obtained. During our investigation
In addition to the "under the waist", Enquirer obtained nine other images:
- M. Bezos makes a selfie in what appears to be a work meeting.
- Ms. Sanchez's response – a photo of her smoking a cigar in what appears to be a simulated oral bad scene.
- Bezos shirtless, holding his phone in his left hand – while wearing his wedding ring. He wears cargo pants or tight black shorts – and his semi-masculine virility appears on the zipper of the garment.
- The complete selfie of Mr. Bezos, dressed only in a tight black boxer pants, the phone in the left hand, while
- A selfie in a bathroom – while wearing his wedding ring. Bezos does not wear anything other than a white towel – and you can see the top of his pubis.
- Sanchez wearing a red dress revealing his cleavage.
- Sanchez wearing a red bikini in two parts with a golden dress revealing his cleavage.
I would not give any publisher the pleasure of sending this e-mail. I hope that common sense will prevail – and quickly.
Dylan
This caught my attention. But not as they probably expected. Any personal embarrbadment that an IMA can cause gets me night because it is about a much bigger topic. If in my position I can not resist this kind of extortion, how many people can they? (At that time, several people contacted our research team about their similar experiences with AMI and the need to capitulate because, for example, their livelihood was at stake.)
In messages from AMI that I make public, you will see the precise details of your exorbitant proposal: they will publish personal photos unless Gavin de Becker and I make a false public statement to the press that "we don" have no knowledge or basis for suggesting that AMI coverage is politically motivated or influenced by political forces. "
If we do not agree to disclose this lie, they will publish the photos immediately. And there is an badociated threat: they will keep the photos at hand and publish them in the future if we turn away from this lie.
I am sure: no real journalist has ever proposed anything like what is going on here: I will not publish any embarrbading information about you if you do X for me . And if you do not do X quickly, we'll make public embarrbading information .
Nothing I could write here could tell the National Enquirer's story as eloquently as his own words below.
These conversations do not consolidate AMI's reputation for long-time use of journalistic privileges, hiding behind important protections and ignoring the principles and goals of true journalism. Of course, I do not want personal photos to be published, but I will not participate in his well-known practice of blackmail, political favors, attacks and corruption. I prefer to get up, roll this post and see what he gives.
Sincerely,
Jeff Bezos Published: Wednesday, February 6, 2019 to 17:57
to: Martin Singer (Lawyer Mr. Becker)
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL RE: * Bezos et al / American Media et al.
Marty –
Here are the terms we propose:
- A joint publication complete and complete of all claims that American Media, on the one hand, and Jeff Bezos and Gavin de Becker (" Bezos "), on the other hand, may have one against the other.
- Commonly acknowledged public recognition of the Bezos parties disclosed by a statement stating that they have no knowledge or basis of what AM was politically motivated or influenced by political forces, and a agreement no longer refers to such a possibility and
- AM agrees not to publish, distribute, share or describe unpublished texts and photos ("unpublished documents").
- AM states that he did not conduct a wiretap in connection with his reports and did not know.
- In case of violation of the agreement by one or more of the Bezos parties, AM is released from its obligations under the agreement and may publish the unpublished information.
- Any other dispute arising from this agreement must first be submitted to the mediation of JAMS (mediation and arbitration) in California.
Thanks,
Jon
Deputy General Counsel
American Media, LLC
Jon P. Fine
Deputy General Counsel, Media
O: (212) 743-6513 C: (347) 920-6541
February 2019
By e-mail:
mdsinger@badxx [19659002] Martin D. Singer
Laveley and Singer
Subject: Jeff Bezos / American Media, LLC and others
Dear Mr. Singer,
I am writing to respond to your message of 4 February 2019 to Dylan Howard and to address our concerns regarding persistent defamation of your client and their representatives regarding the motivations.
In fact, we inform you that our news and reports on matters concerning your client, including any use of his "private photographs", have been and will remain consistent. with the applicable laws. As you know, "the correct use of a work protected by copyright, including its use for reproduction purposes … for purposes of criticism, comment, report … is not a copyright infringement "17 USC Sec. 107. With millions of Americans interested in the success of Amazon, whose client is still the founder and CEO, an investigation into Bezos' judgment capacity, as reflected in his messages and his photos, actually goes in the direction of the public interest.
You must also address a number of unsubstantiated unfounded statements and rude rumors attributed to your clients' representatives in the press, suggesting that "strong links indicate political motivations" in the publication of the article from The National Enquirer. In fact, you yourself have stated that the "political motives" of our business are "evident" in your message from Mr. de Becker to Mr. Howard dated January 31, 2019.
As I l In my February 1 response to his January 31 correspondence, American Media categorically rejected any claim that his report was displaced, dictated, or influenced in any way by outside, political, or other forces. .
However, we understand that your client's representatives, including the Washington Post, continue to seek out and disseminate such false and misleading claims in a manner prejudicial to American Media and its officers. .
We ask you to immediately stop such defamatory behavior. Any subsequent dissemination of these false, vicious, speculative and unfounded statements is made at the risk and peril of your client. In the absence of immediate cessation of defamatory behavior, we will have no choice but to seek all remedies provided by law.
As I have already indicated, we defend the legality of our investigation into news and reports on this subject of public concern and concern. Moreover, American Media is not prevented from continuing to tell a story that is unambiguous in the public interest – a position that Bezos clearly appreciates, as evidenced by Boies Schiller's letter to American Media on January 9, stating that his client "discourage reports" on this subject and "supports the efforts of journalists".
That said, if your client agrees to stop and abandon such defamatory behavior, we will be willing to engage in constructive discussions about the messages and photos we have in our journal. power. Dylan Howard is ready to discuss the matter at his convenience.
Sincerely,
https://medium.com/@jeffreypbezos/no-thank-you-mr-pecker-146e3922310f
Source link
