[ad_1]
Laurence Casagrande, who came to preside over Dersa, is the target of the operation Pedra no Caminho, an investigation into the deviations of R $ 600 million from the Rodoanel
By decreeing the preventive detention of the former Secretary of Transport and Logistics, Laurence Casagrande Lourenço, Judge Maria Isabel do Prado, of the 5th Federal Criminal Court of São Paulo, cited the testimony of a witness who disclosed alleged orders to "shred documents". The former portfolio chief, who came to preside over Dersa, is the target of Operation Pedra no Caminho, a survey of R $ 600 million deviations from North Rodoanel.
In the decision, the judge cites the testimony of a witness "who worked as personal secretary of Laurence Casagrande for seven years until her exemption in 2018"
According to the judge, Pedro da Silva "figured as one of the main and most influential members of the criminal organization."
"He revealed that the investigators determined that the documents were overwritten or made personally," reports Maria Isabel. Prado. in the post of director of engineering of Dersa, only subordinate to Laurence Casagrande. "
The Magistrate Still Justifies Preventive Detention." Despite the fact that investigations were conducted by the press before the bursting of the search and seizure and arrest measures, the investigators did not find any evidence. have not left public office, Laucence being, until the day of measures, president "
The judge affirmed that" the risk of delinquent repetition in other public bodies responsible for large financial movement of state resources can not be ignored. "
" These circumstances show the maintenance of economic power and political power, and allow a glimpse of the danger posed by the freedom of the respondent to the social environment, justifying the decree and the maintenance of the preventive custody based on the guarantee of public order and the economic order as well as, for the convenience of instruction the criminal law and to ensure the enforcement of criminal law
The judge adds that the investigations "reveal that the freedom of the respondents implies an imminent risk for the probative activity, given the obvious probability, at liberty, of destroying the evidence, compelling the witnesses, obstruct the investigation, alienate the illicit products and commit other crimes, besides the possibility of escape, thus justifying a preventive arrest for the guarantee of public order and the Economic order, as well as, for the convenience of criminal investigation and to ensure the enforcement of criminal law. "
Defense
] By the floor, the defense of Pedro Paulo Dantas make Amaral Campos:
" Fortunately, the Court recognized the lack of reason, the motive and the necessity of this arbitrary arrest of Pedro Paulo. And he will soon recognize that there was no wrongfulness.
Lawyers Daniel Bialski, Patrícia Uzum and Juliana Bignardi "
Copyright © 2018,
[ad_2]
Source link
