[ad_1]
The United States delegation vetoed, in accordance with President Donald Trump's motto, that it demands "America first" (or "gongoric" in the definition of one of the Brazilian negotiators).
The mention of multilateralism in the group document which is the quintessence of multilateralism marks the G20 summit of Buenos Aires as the lowest point of this concept.
A second proof of the weakening of global cooperation – which has been the driving force behind the G20's transformation – is worth $ 10 billion a year. This is the excerpt of the document relating to the Paris Agreement.
The United States began negotiating the text with the right of veto by mentioning this treaty, which is the most comprehensive global effort to combat climate change.
But the text also indicates that the United States remains outside the consensus of their peers.
It is true that the United States does not agree with the United States and that the pact is irreversible. that the G20 communiqué calls for a reform of the WTO (World Trade Organization) to try to defuse the tensions in international trade, also caused by Donald Trump.
The WTO is the largest multilateral institution in the economic field, perhaps even more so than the International Monetary Fund, because its decisions affect daily trade, while the IMF is acting more decisive in case of emergency.
In theory, then, by agreeing to transfer the trade war to a multilateral organization, the United States would violate their disregard for multilateralism.
This is not the case: a reform at an embryonic stage of the WTO is moving the negotiations to multiple groups. Trump decides to continue acting unilaterally in his war against the Chinese during the debate on the reform of the WTO.
The crisis of multilateralism is on the horizon since the first speech of the G20 summit organized by President Maurício Macri: he acknowledged that "multilateral mechanisms have been called into question in recent years "including the G20, and there are national versions showing how to look at global challenges individually. "
For those who like to see the panels in detail, it is nonetheless eloquent that the organizers of the summit neglected to remove an old one, (19659002). This evoked a crisis in the faculty of the exact sciences, but it might be useful meeting point for journalists or the G20
Source link
