[ad_1]
Originally published in Rede Brasil Actual
(29), justifying its decision to cancel the United Nations Climate Conference (COP-25) at Brazil in 2019. "Triple A is a large band that originates from the Andes, Amazon and Atlantic, on 136 million hectares, along the channel of Solimões and Amazonas rivers, could make us lose our sovereignty in this region, "he explained soon after (19659004). Bolsonaro's position finds an echo in the armed forces. On September 19, the commander of the army, General Villas Bôas, used Twitter to warn against the risk that this Triple A represents. For Brazil.
"Do you know what is the" Triple A Corridor "? It is a matter of sovereignty! My mission as @exercitooficial commander, concerned about national interests, is to make it happen. indicate the risks of this proposal to the country We need to discuss in depth with the company The detail is that the dreaded ecological corridor supposed to jeopardize the sovereignty of Brazil does not exist in the Paris Agreement, approved in 2015 by 195 countries to reduce emissions from Brazil, "said the general in the social network.
Greenhouse gases (GHGs) as a means of containing global warming and climate change.
"Triple A is an invention, a ragged excuse, has no other name.There is no triple A. It was an idea of someone, I think in Colombia who was attending a meeting, and this idea has never been put forward, it is not part of the Climate Conference, an idea that was born and did not take revenge, "said Márcio Astrini, Greenpeace Brazil's Public Policy Coordinator. "The Paris Agreement is made up of what countries should do, but each country sets its goals on a voluntary basis, there is no imposition . Triple A is an idea that does not exist and, if it existed, would not appear in the Paris Agreement. It is unfortunate that a President of the Republic speaks with absurdity. "
The Brazilian economic crisis was also used by Bolsonaro to justify the cancellation of the event." An argument that, according to Márcio Astrini, would not be pursued either, because the federal government could dialogue with the United Nations to collaborate on the costs of the event, which had already occurred in previous years in other countries. "Brazil is not the first country not to have resources needed to organize the conference and would therefore have additional resources, "says the Public Policy Coordinator of Greenpeace Brazil.
For him, the cancellation of the COP-25 is the first measure. Bolsonaro's anti-environmental agenda. "He promised a lot of bad things for the environment. Returning to the question of the conference, he sends the following message: "Any image that Brazil has built since the ECO 92, according to which the country is an actor of the environmental agenda, is going to terminate. In my government, the environment does not have space. "
In a note, the Climate Observatory, a network of civil society entities that discuss climate change, said the cancellation of COP-25 in Brazil removed the
"Brazil is thus abdicating its role in the world in one of the few areas where the country needs more than relevance: the fight against the climate. Ironically, it is by ideology that the elected president and his chancellor have promised to "root out" public administration. With the abandonment of international leadership in this field, there are also opportunities for business, investment and job creation. By ignoring the climate program, the federal government also fails to protect the population, stricken by an increasing number of extreme weather events. These, unfortunately, do not cease to happen simply because some doubts, "says the note from the Climate Observatory.
The international repercussion and its consequences have already begun.In arriving Thursday (29 ) in Buenos Aires, for the G20 meeting, the French president, Emmanuel Macron, arrived by giving a message. "I am not in favor of signing trade agreements with powers that do not respect the G20. Paris Agreement. I have asked my companies to adapt and I will not sign treaties with countries that do not respect or respect it. "
The Greenpeace coordinator believes that Macron's position is only the first and that others will come." Just as it is the first Bolsonaro move against the environment , the Macron is also the first movement of repercussion of what he does. And that will not stop there, there will be others, which could harm the economy of Brazil and the relations with the client countries. "
Paris Agreement
After having presented its own congress in Paris, at COP-21, in Paris, commitments in favor of the fight against global warming, Brazil approved at the National Congress, in September 2016 , the process of ratifying the Paris Agreement.Thus, Brazil's objectives were no longer "planned" and became official commitments, now called Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs).
"NDC do Brasil is committed to reducing its greenhouse gas emissions by 37% below 2005 levels by 2025, with a subsequent indicative contribution of 43% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions 2005 to 2030. To this end, the country is committed to increasing the share of sustainable bioenergy in its energy matrix to about 18% by 2030, restoring and reforesting 12 million hectares of land. forests and will reach about 45% of renewable energy in the composition of the energy matrix in 2030 ", explains the Ministry of the Environment on its website. .
The text also indicates that the NDC badumed by the country "corresponds to an estimated reduction of 66% of greenhouse gas emissions per unit of GDP in 2025 and 75% in terms of intensity of emissions. emissions in 2030, compared to 2005. Brazil will therefore reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the context of a continuous increase in the In addition to per capita income, which gives ambition to these objectives "
In no document of the Paris Agreement or its rectification, approved by the Brazilian Congress, there is no mention of Triple A, the ecological corridor, according to Bolsonaro and the commander of the army, jeopardizes the sovereignty of the country.
[ad_2]
Source link
