[ad_1]
This Thursday, the British Prime Minister will travel to Brussels to try to renegotiate the Brexit agreement, at a meeting that all participants predict as a mere formality without any practical sense. Theresa May is opposed by the British Parliament to the safeguard mechanism for Northern Ireland and will face a European Union that collectively refuses any renegotiation in the matter.
Last Tuesday, Theresa May went to Belfast, the capital. from Northern Ireland, where he stated that his commitment to preventing the return of the two Irishmen's borders was unshakeable. The problem is that the European Union does not want to know this compromise at all and is not available to return to the negotiating table.
Arlene Foster, leader of the DUP trade unionists who support the government, said "it is good that the Prime Minister is going to Brussels to find solutions, but she needs to focus on the commitments she has made with the House of Commons, that is your mandate and that is what I expect.A reversal would undermine the economic and constitutional integrity of the United Kingdom. "
in other words, both parties are irreducible and, as all badysts say, it is certainly impossible to reach an agreement. Like the amendment pbaded in Parliament at the same time, according to which a Brexit without agreement is not possible, it does not have the force of law, the worst is a step forward: the non-agreement.
The only hypothesis of Theresa May's return for Brussels to be more effective than the predicted disaster is that the Prime Minister has in his possession another idea to propose to the Union. But to get an idea, whatever it is, it should have been submitted to the House of Commons. – and as this has not happened, may not even be mandated to debate anything.
In the meantime, British newspapers – or British newspapers – were astonished yesterday by a kind of explosion by Donald Tusk, president of the Council. European, who has publicly said everything that was close to waiting for that there is a place reserved in hell for anyone who would decide for Brexit without thinking of all its consequences: "at least a glimpse of the plan, "he said.
The Guardian came to me, and David Smith, Michael Gove, Liam Fox, Daniel Hannan and Nigel Farage make up the list of sinners.
And the sins are no less: Davis, former Minister of Brexit, was unaware of the functioning of the Union; Johnson, a former foreign minister, said the costs of Brexit would be practically nil; Gove, former Secretary of State, thought that the British could choose Brexit as they wished; Fox, another former state secretary, felt that the post-Brexit free trade agreement between the UK and the Union would be "the easiest thing to do." history"; European MEP Daniel Hannan went on to say that after Brexit, municipal taxes would fall by 60%. and Farage, a former right-wing leader of the UKIP, said that "the referendum was our golden opportunity".
[ad_2]
Source link
