[ad_1]
In recent months we have discovered something amazing: the astronauts, despite all their heroism, are … human. This means that they too can be precarious and not want to lose the admiration of the people. This feeling becomes institutional, as NASA demonstrated when launching an investigation involving SpaceX and Boeing, simply because Elon Musk appeared in a smoking podcast (badly) a Jamaican tobacco cigarette. .
It is not today that NASA is angry at SpaceX, some have complained of its insistence on developing reusable rockets, which NASA has tried for decades and has not never done (no, the shuttle is retreadable, it took a year to fly again). In the cultural conflict between the two NASA Advisory Bodies, SpaceX offers "serious risk" to astronauts.
NASA is even complaining to the Roadster after being offended by the fact that SpaceX is attracting so much attention, amaze so many people with a simple test. It's wrong! According to the protocol, the tests should use mbad simulators, a concrete block the size of a typical load. Sending a car and watching it in streaming is humiliating for an agency that did not want to install cameras on Travelers and Pioneers, and that had to be convinced by Carl Sagan, who broke through the key to scientific dissemination. For scientists, beautiful pictures bring very little information and are therefore of no interest.
This implication does not only concern SpaceX. There are many agents in the space agency who turn their heads in front of Blue Origin by Jeff Bezos, claiming that New Sheppard is a toy for the rich, even if it is based on their own experiences NASA for each version tested.
of time is the Virgin Galactic, of Richard Branson, our Tony Stark apart from the solution that, among others, innovated by creating the concept of Carmen Electra for the trip.
Branson does not have one, but two space societies. Virgin Galactic and Virgin Orbit.
They will use technology already tested by the ATK Orbital, in which an airplane carries the rocket at a considerable altitude. in flight and avoids having to cross the densest part of the atmosphere. The rocket is the One launcher and the aircraft is a modified 747 called Cosmic Girl:
The other company is the Virgin Galactic, which intends to take tourists, enthusiasts, scientists in the space. This is the brainchild of the X Award, won by SpaceShipOne, designed by Burt Rutan and funded by Paul Allen. The first vessel, VSS Enterprise, was lost in an accident in October 2014, which significantly delayed the program. Everyone has chosen to do it at once. meanwhile, the second vessel in Branson's fleet, the VSS Unity, had only flown three flights, including one with the engine driven, and yet it was flying straight, without attempting a parabolic trajectory
. December 13, they finally flew, still not using all the power of the engine, but reaching an altitude of 82.7 km, which can be considered a lower limit of space, at least the official definition in
This was the first time since July 8, 2011, as part of Space Shuttle mission STS-135, that American astronauts were arriving in space on their own ship.
Virgin celebrates his film with a beautiful video. a letter from Richard Branson as My grandson, extolling the merits of the pioneer, draws a parallel with the early years of aviation:
Of course, not everyone not in celebration.
He complains that Richard Branson says that he's going to send people into space, but that the spacecraft is performing a parabolic, non-orbital flight, et cetera. who reaches the maximum altitude begins to fall.
Everyone knows it. The energy needed to reach 100, 150 km altitude, as will Unity and New Sheppard, is 3% of the energy needed to put something in orbit. Andy also claims that Branson considers the trip safe, what ordinary people can do, when a high-performance aircraft is dangerous, the risks are many. But this is taken into account since the beginning of the project, the goal is to do something much safer than a space shuttle, and there is no practical reason for that. Unity and his successors are not as certain as a 737.
He also stated that "technology allowing humans to install in space is not going anywhere on the contrary, it's a dead-end technology. "
According to this logic, Cessna should close its doors. Virgin Airlines is not the only market capable of carrying tons of freight on 10,000-kilometer journeys and, as advanced fighters, we're not even talking about it.
Andy does not understand that it is different markets. Virgin Galactic could become, for example, the leading provider of microgravity training for NASA and other agencies. In Comet-Vomit, you get 15, 20 seconds of microgravity.
He even disregarded Richard Branson's interest in creating a spaceport in Australia, saying that Branson would seek tax breaks and would have nowhere to expand, given the "limitations" of VSS Unity.
It is clear that the idea that ordinary citizens sneak on the wings of a ship by a playboy, a billionaire, a genius, a philanthropist does not please representatives of Space Status Quo , who wish to keep their fields free from curiosity, with their long-term plans, such as NASA who wishes to consider placing people in orbit around the moon (without landing) in the 2030s.
Ordinary People n & # As we accept these bureaucratic delays, we live in an agile time. Moreover, we live in a mundane era where being a pbadenger in a spaceship, it is that being a pbadenger and going into space will no longer be something superhuman envied and admired by the mbades . Anyone who has this status today and is about to lose it does what he can. Fortunately, all he can do is point the grapes and say that he is green.
Source link
