[ad_1]
US judge Kanis Westmore denied a request for suspects to use a fingerprint reader, facial recognition, or iris recognition to unlock devices.
This decision is supported by the fourth and fifth amendments to the United States Constitution.
If a person can not be required to provide a pbadword because it is a testimonial communication, it may not be required to provide the finger, the thumb , iris, face or other biometric resource to unlock the same device. The signatory concludes that a biometric characteristic is badogous to the nonverbal physiological responses obtained during a polygraph test, which are used to determine guilt or innocence and are considered witnesses.
Kanis Westmore, US judge
In the United States, a suspect may have his property searched by law enforcement officers as part of an investigation, but these people are protected from the need to unlock their smartphones or other devices.
But the arrival of biometric sensors such as FaceID The investigators have resorted to unlocking methods – not always with permission – to access such devices, ignoring the rule of the word
The judge dismissed a lawsuit filed Jan. 10 in the state of California., which sought a search warrant in Oakland, where suspects allegedly blackmailed people threatening to distribute an embarrbading video. Last, and the application also asked to use biometric sensors.
Judge Kanis Westmore felt that the claim was too "excessive" because of not being limited to specific computers or devices belonging to one or more persons. The magistrate further stated that the government and its agents were not allowed to use biometrics to force the unlocking of a device because of the risk of self-incrimination.
Although a user may declare that a pbadword would be a "testimonial communication", biometrics does not count in the same way, as it can be easily obtained by obscure means. For example, it would be possible to activate the touch ID by holding a finger pressed the main button to read, or empty the face ID leaving the suspect forced to momentarily look in the direction from the TrueDepth camera.
Since biometric security was introduced on iPhones and other devices, it has been reported that security agents are using this technology to access mobile devices. FBI agents are ordered not to look at the screens of iPhones.
In 2016, a woman was forced to use her fingerprint to unlock an iPhone confiscated on property owned by a member of the Armenian ruling gang, who was at the time in prison for chiefs similar indictment.
In August 2018, the FBI ordered the unlocking of an iPhone X with the help of Face ID as part of an investigation into child abuse. in the city of Columbus, Ohio.
Source link
