"When a woman gets pregnant, she is imprisoned for nine months, a man who can have as many children as the number of partners willing to have bad with her."
"It's an asymmetry that's part of our anatomy," Pinker said. "And it's not surprising that another part of our anatomy, our brain, reflects this difference."
In summary, what Pinker and many other experts have concluded from experience is that because of the risk of pregnancy, a woman is much more cautious in the choice of 39, a partner and is not interested in casual bad.
Same results
Several subsequent studies reproducing the 1978 experiment yielded the same results, indicating that the behavior had not changed since.
In one of the most recent events held in Denmark in 2010, no women accepted casual bad with a stranger, unlike most men. And the proportion of men who said they had bad with a stranger was greater than what she would have liked to have a coffee with a stranger.
Another work done in Germany in 2015 focused on a place deemed more conducive to an indecent proposal: a discotheque.
the results
Photo: iStock / BBC News Brazil
But even here, the results have remained the same.
Woman and bad
Although the findings of the study seem indisputable, some voices, mostly female, have reservations about the conclusions of the study.
These critics do not dispute the fact that the vast majority of women would refuse a badual offer from a stranger. But they say that does not mean that they do not like casual bad.
For them, the explanation of the results is not biological, but cultural.
In the book " Inferior: How science was wrong to women ", the journalist Angela Saini said that the moral constraints that should dictate the woman's behavior explain the refusal of the woman to indulge in casual bad as part of the study
Saini rejects interpretations that focus solely on the biological side.
"(It is incorrect) to think that we can separate nature and creation, biological and cultural, and go to the root of who we really are," she told the BBC.
"What we really are are social beings and you can not separate one thing from the other."
Critics of the findings of the report Experience say that a woman's attitude to bad has more to do with the cultural than with the biological
(19459040) The woman who never evolved ", recognizes that the camp that never evolved Sarah Blaffer Hrdy, author of definition of attitudes of women with respect to bad.
She points out that, although in recent centuries women have been considered less badual than men, this has not always been the case.
"In some cultures, women were feared and considered to be demons and too badual." The ancient Greeks compared women to bears and lions, suggesting that it was imperative to keep them locked up. "
And although the vision has changed a lot since the Victorian era, while psychologists thought that women had no badual desire, it is true that even in the 21st century and in the West, women are confronted with strong social constraints. bad.
Fear
This is the position of the psychologist Terri Conley, who studied the subject in 2011. "Women are judged more severe if they have occasional bad than men, and that's something who worries them. "
Conley cites an example of modern life: the so-called walk of shame phrase used in some English-speaking countries when a woman comes home in the morning, dressed in the clothes of the previous night. after having a chance meeting with someone.
"There are studies showing that a woman increases her reputation if she accepts a badual offering: she may be considered a" prostitute "or a desperate badist.The man does not suffer social harm ", recognizes Cordelia Fine. Testosterone Rex .
Fine, a professor at the University of Melbourne, Australia, highlights another key element in understanding why all women who have studied have refused to have bad with a stranger: the fear of violence.
"The experiments actually showed that women were not too worried about being in a situation where they could be murdered, raped or aroused the interest of a potential stalker," he said. she told the BBC.
Andreas Baranowski and Heiko Hecht, the German researchers who reproduced the experience in a nightclub, wondered what would happen if women were offered an occasional badual offer without fear of reputation or reputation. for physical integrity.
They devised a second experiment to mitigate the fear factor: they invited a group of male and female volunteers to a laboratory under the pretext of helping a dating company to evaluate their compatibility algorithm.
Ten pictures of members of the opposite bad were presented to them and they were led to believe that the ten had already agreed to meet them (having a date or having bad).
The results are remarkable: there is almost no difference between the bades.
All men and 97% of women agreed to meet at least one of the candidates likely to have bad.
Another study by psychologist Terri Conley has reached similar conclusions.
She used Hollywood stars as potential casual partners instead of unknowns.
and the women interviewed stated that they would agree to casual bad with Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie.
She asked a group of men that they would accept a badual proposal from Angelina Jolie and a group of women would agree to have bad with Brad Pitt.
Most answered yes.
These experiments raised doubts about the categorical conclusions that had been reigning for decades on the famous work of Hatfield and Clark.
And they indicate that the idea that women do not like bad as much as men can be wrong.
See also:
The small country where we speak more than 800 languages
BBC News Brazil – All rights reserved. No reproduction is permitted without the written consent of BBC News Brazil.
[ad_2]
Source link